The importance of the urologist in male oncology fertility preservation.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 35535513_BIB_DF818FC89544.pdf (283.33 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_DF818FC89544
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
The importance of the urologist in male oncology fertility preservation.
Périodique
BJU international
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Micol L.A., Adenubi F., Williamson E., Lane S., Mitchell R.T., Sangster P.
ISSN
1464-410X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1464-4096
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
130
Numéro
5
Pages
637-645
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To demonstrate that surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) and spermatogonial stem cell retrieval (SSCR) in an oncological context are safe and successful.
This a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in the UK. Patients requiring fertility preservation from December 2017 to January 2020 were included. Data were analysed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20).
Among 1264 patients referred to the Reproductive Medical Unit at the University College of London Hospitals for cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment, 39 chose to go forward with SSR/SSCR because they presented as azoo-/cryptozoospermic or an inability to masturbate/ejaculate. Interventions were testicular sperm extraction (23 patients) or aspiration (one), electroejaculation (one), and testicular wedge biopsy for SSCR (14). The median (range) age was 15.0 (10-65) years and the median testosterone level was 4.4 nmoL/L. Primary diagnoses were sarcoma in 11 patients, leukaemia in nine, lymphoma in eight, testicular tumour in five, other oncological haematological entities in two, other solid cancers in two, while two patients had non-oncological haematological diseases. SSR/SSCR could be offered within 7.5 days on average. Chemotherapy could follow within 2 days from SSR/SSCR, and bone marrow transplant occurred within 19.5 days (all expressed as medians). The success rate for SSR was 68.0% (at least one vial/straw collected). The mean (SD) Johnsen score of testicular biopsies was 5.23 (2.25) with a trend towards positive correlation with SSR success (P = 0.07). However, age, hormonal profile and type of cancer did not predict SSR outcome.
We show that SSR and SSCR in an oncological context are valid treatment options with a high success rate for patients in which sperm cryopreservation from semen is impossible. By providing an effective pathway, fertility preservation is possible with minimal delay to oncological treatment.
Mots-clé
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Cryopreservation, Fertility Preservation, Retrospective Studies, Semen, Testicular Neoplasms/therapy, Testosterone, Urologists, Child, azoospermia, cancer, chemotherapy, cryptozoospermia, fertility preservation, surgical sperm retrieval
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
10/06/2022 16:08
Dernière modification de la notice
23/01/2024 7:35
Données d'usage