Idées reçues en préhospitalier [Prehospital misconceptions]
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_DC2AADABF87A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Idées reçues en préhospitalier [Prehospital misconceptions]
Périodique
Revue medicale suisse
ISSN
1660-9379 (Print)
ISSN-L
1660-9379
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/08/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
13
Numéro
570
Pages
1365-1368
Langue
français
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
We confronted some of the most prevalent prehospital misconceptions with the available literature. We found that: the diminution of a retrosternal pain following nitrate administration is not predictive of a cardiac origin of the pain ; survival of traumatic cardiac arrest may not be as bad as usually believed ; peripheral venous administration of vasopressors through proximal catheters during short times may be considered as a safe temporary alternative to central venous access ; using the pulse palpation usually lead to an under-estimation of the systolic blood pressure ; applying a pelvic belt at the level of the iliac crests doesn't aggravate an open-book fracture; there is no 90 mmHg threshold values below which mortality increases in traumatic brain injuries.
Mots-clé
Blood Pressure, Emergency Medical Services, Heart Arrest, Humans, Vasoconstrictor Agents
Pubmed
Création de la notice
02/11/2017 17:47
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:01