Response to the comments on "The formation of Pangea" by D.A. Ruban

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_DC076EB3AA98
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Response to the comments on "The formation of Pangea" by D.A. Ruban
Périodique
Tectonophysics
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Stampfli G.M.
ISSN
0040-1951
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
608
Pages
1445-1447
Langue
anglais
Résumé
The Variscan structures of the Caucasus region are still quite difficult to decipher, they certainly deserved some in depth investigations in the future. Thus, it is right to question any paleogeographic models proposed in that area, as made by D.A. Ruban. We present here the arguments that we used to decide on the distribution of the terranes in that region. The Transcaucasus massif is regarded as pertaining to the Galatian super-terrane, whereas, the Great Caucasus terrane belongs to the Hanseatic ribbon terrane. The latter was a part of Hunia, detached from Laurussia in the Devonian.
Mots-clé
Plate tectonic reconstruction, Greater Caucasus, Paleozoic, Gondwana
Création de la notice
01/09/2014 11:26
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 17:00
Données d'usage