Background: The number of medical studies performed through online surveys has increased dramatically in recent years.
Despite their numerous advantages (eg, sample size, facilitated access to individuals presenting stigmatizing issues), selection
bias may exist in online surveys. However, evidence on the representativeness of self-selected samples in online studies is patchy.
Objective: Our objective was to explore the representativeness of a self-selected sample of online gamers using online players’
virtual characters (avatars).
Methods: All avatars belonged to individuals playing World of Warcraft (WoW), currently the most widely used online game.
Avatars’ characteristics were defined using various games’ scores, reported on the WoW’s official website, and two self-selected
samples from previous studies were compared with a randomly selected sample of avatars.
Results: We used scores linked to 1240 avatars (762 from the self-selected samples and 478 from the random sample). The two
self-selected samples of avatars had higher scores on most of the assessed variables (except for guild membership and exploration).
Furthermore, some guilds were overrepresented in the self-selected samples.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that more proficient players or players more involved in the game may be more likely to
participate in online surveys. Caution is needed in the interpretation of studies based on online surveys that used a self-selection
recruitment procedure. Epidemiological evidence on the reduced representativeness of sample of online surveys is warranted