Impact of confrontation to patient suffering and death on wellbeing and burnout in professionals: a cross-sectional study.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 38486209_BIB_D8B95633DDDB.pdf (2324.15 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_D8B95633DDDB
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Impact of confrontation to patient suffering and death on wellbeing and burnout in professionals: a cross-sectional study.
Périodique
BMC palliative care
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Delafontaine A.C., Anders R., Mathieu B., Salathé C.R., Putois B.
ISSN
1472-684X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1472-684X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
15/03/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
23
Numéro
1
Pages
74
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Palliative care and oncology generate a risk of burnout and psychological distress in professionals. The purpose of this study is to identify both psychopathological and positive factors related to mental health at work. It aims (i) to explore the extent to which these professionals are confronted with suffering, illness, and death; and to explore the prevalence of psychological distress and/or burnout, (ii) to identify potential determinants of burnout and psychological wellbeing at work, (iii) to develop an integrative model of mental health; and to identify frequency and impact of confrontations with death, and (iv) to identify profiles of professionals are at risk of developing a mental health disorder or, conversely, characterized by wellbeing.
A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in palliative care and oncology evaluating confrontations with death, coping, burnout, psychological distress, personality, self-esteem, well-being and meaning at work. Regressions, clustering, and structural equation modeling analyses were performed.
109 professionals participated (58% from oncology and 42% from palliative care), of which 79% were female, and 65% were between 30 and 49 years old. Aim i: 30% witnessed an intolerable suffering at least 9 times a month, 45% reported moderate to high levels of burnout, 39% suffered from anxiety and 11% from depression. Aim ii: the determinants of burnout were the personality traits conscientiousness and neuroticism, low meaning of work, and low wellbeing (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.44). The determinants of wellbeing were work meaning, depersonalization, self-esteem, fulfillment and low emotional exhaustion (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.71). Aim iii: the integrative model included both well-being (self-esteem, conscientiousness) and psychopathology (neuroticism, anxiety) parameters, and strongly satisfied the standard SEM goodness of fit indices (e.g., CFI, IFI, and TLI ≥ 0.95). Aim iv: three profiles were identified: (a) a "distressed profile" with a majority of professionals at the patient's bedside, (b) a "disengaged profile" with professionals working as second-line consultants, (c) a "wellbeing profile" contains profiles of caregivers insensitive to psychological distress and with a high level of positive Impact of confrontation on different areas of their lives.
An integrative approach is essential to understand the full range of mental health issues for professionals. Meaning of work is a key factor in professional interventions that should primarily affect front-line professionals with limited experience.
Mots-clé
Humans, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Male, Cross-Sectional Studies, Burnout, Psychological, Anxiety, Emotions, Mental Disorders, Burnout, Death confrontations, Healthcare professionals, Meaning at work, Oncology, Palliative care, Personality, Psychological distress, Self-esteem, Work wellbeing
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
18/03/2024 16:57
Dernière modification de la notice
09/08/2024 15:06
Données d'usage