Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D82CD48CF6FB
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Does Stepwise Voltage Ramping Protect the Kidney from Injury During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy? Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Périodique
European urology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Skuginna V., Nguyen D.P., Seiler R., Kiss B., Thalmann G.N., Roth B.
ISSN
1873-7560 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0302-2838
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
02/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
69
Numéro
2
Pages
267-273
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Renal damage is more frequent with new-generation lithotripters. However, animal studies suggest that voltage ramping minimizes the risk of complications following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). In the clinical setting, the optimal voltage strategy remains unclear.
To evaluate whether stepwise voltage ramping can protect the kidney from damage during SWL.
A total of 418 patients with solitary or multiple unilateral kidney stones were randomized to receive SWL using a Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter with either stepwise voltage ramping (n=213) or a fixed maximal voltage (n=205).
SWL.
The primary outcome was sonographic evidence of renal hematomas. Secondary outcomes included levels of urinary markers of renal damage, stone disintegration, stone-free rate, and rates of secondary interventions within 3 mo of SWL. Descriptive statistics were used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. A logistic regression model was generated to assess predictors of hematomas.
Significantly fewer hematomas occurred in the ramping group(12/213, 5.6%) than in the fixed group (27/205, 13%; p=0.008). There was some evidence that the fixed group had higher urinary β2-microglobulin levels after SWL compared to the ramping group (p=0.06). Urinary microalbumin levels, stone disintegration, stone-free rate, and rates of secondary interventions did not significantly differ between the groups. The logistic regression model showed a significantly higher risk of renal hematomas in older patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.05; p=0.04). Stepwise voltage ramping was associated with a lower risk of hematomas (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.80; p=0.01). The study was limited by the use of ultrasound to detect hematomas.
In this prospective randomized study, stepwise voltage ramping during SWL was associated with a lower risk of renal damage compared to a fixed maximal voltage without compromising treatment effectiveness.
Lithotripsy is a noninvasive technique for urinary stone disintegration using ultrasonic energy. In this study, two voltage strategies are compared. The results show that a progressive increase in voltage during lithotripsy decreases the risk of renal hematomas while maintaining excellent outcomes.
ISRCTN95762080.
Mots-clé
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Albuminuria/etiology, Female, Hematoma/diagnostic imaging, Hematoma/etiology, Humans, Kidney/injuries, Kidney Calculi/therapy, Kidney Diseases/diagnostic imaging, Kidney Diseases/etiology, Lithotripsy/adverse effects, Lithotripsy/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, beta 2-Microglobulin/urine, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, Randomized trial, Renal damage, Voltage ramping
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
08/01/2021 16:46
Dernière modification de la notice
09/01/2021 7:26
Données d'usage