Reporting Radical Cystectomy Outcomes Following Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D65600B061D7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Reporting Radical Cystectomy Outcomes Following Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.
Périodique
European urology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Williams S.B., Cumberbatch MGK, Kamat A.M., Jubber I., Kerr P.S., McGrath J.S., Djaladat H., Collins J.W., Packiam V.T., Steinberg G.D., Lee E., Kassouf W., Black P.C., Cerantola Y., Catto JWF, Daneshmand S.
ISSN
1873-7560 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0302-2838
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
78
Numéro
5
Pages
719-730
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Systematic Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative approach to managing surgical patients. The impact of ERAS on radical cystectomy (RC) outcomes remains understudied.
To review the literature regarding ERAS protocols and RC outcomes. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS).
A systematic review of the articles published from 1970 through 2018 was conducted. Individual patient data (IPD) were requested and a meta-analysis was performed.
A total of 4197 articles were retrieved and 22 (reporting 4048 patients) were selected for the review. LOS followed by 30-d and that followed by 90-d complications were the most common endpoints. ERAS use was associated with reduced morbidity, quicker bowel recovery, and shorter LOS, without affecting mortality. IPD were obtained for 2077 patients from 11 studies. In multivariable models, LOS was associated with ERAS use (regression coefficient: -4.54 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -5.79 to -3.28] d with ERAS p < 0.001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (+1.64 [1.38-1.90] d for each point increase, p < 0.001), and varied between hospitals (from -1.59 [-3.03 to -0.14] to +4.55 [1.89-7.21] d, p < 0.03). Individual ERAS components associated with shorter LOS included no nasogastric (NG) tube (-8.70 [-11.9 to -5.53] d, p < 0.001) and local anesthesia blocks compared with regional anesthesia (-3.29 [-6.31 to -0.27] d, p = 0.03).
ERAS protocols were associated with reduced LOS and postoperative complication rate. Avoidance of NG tubes and use of local anesthesia blocks were significantly associated with reduced LOS. These findings reflect different components of recovery, which ERAS can optimize and further support documentation of the use of ERAS components when reporting RC outcomes.
Use of enhanced recovery in patients undergoing surgery to remove the bladder is associated with fewer surgical complications and a shorter hospital stay. Avoidance of nasogastric tubes and use of local anesthesia after the operation were associated with a shorter length of stay.
Mots-clé
Cystectomy/methods, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Humans, Length of Stay, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery, Cystectomy, Enhanced recovery, Length of stay, Outcomes
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
08/07/2020 12:34
Dernière modification de la notice
16/04/2024 7:13
Données d'usage