Differences in pandemic influenza vaccination policies for pregnant women in Europe.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D587578A4D5B
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Differences in pandemic influenza vaccination policies for pregnant women in Europe.
Périodique
BMC Public Health
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Luteijn J.M., Dolk H., Marnoch G.J.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
Eurocat Registry (Addor MC included)
Contributeur⸱rice⸱s
Eurocat Registry : Addor MC et al. 
ISSN
1471-2458 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1471-2458
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Volume
11
Pages
819
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: An important component of the policy to deal with the H1N1 pandemic in 2009 was to develop and implement vaccination. Since pregnant women were found to be at particular risk of severe morbidity and mortality, the World Health Organization and the European Centers for Disease Control advised vaccinating pregnant women, regardless of trimester of pregnancy. This study reports a survey of vaccination policies for pregnant women in European countries.
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to European competent authorities of 27 countries via the European Medicines Agency and to leaders of registries of European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies in 21 countries.
RESULTS: Replies were received for 24 out of 32 European countries of which 20 had an official pandemic vaccination policy. These 20 countries all had a policy targeting pregnant women. For two of the four countries without official pandemic vaccination policies, some vaccination of pregnant women took place. In 12 out of 20 countries the policy was to vaccinate only second and third trimester pregnant women and in 8 out of 20 countries the policy was to vaccinate pregnant women regardless of trimester of pregnancy. Seven different vaccines were used for pregnant women, of which four contained adjuvants. Few countries had mechanisms to monitor the number of vaccinations given specifically to pregnant women over time. Vaccination uptake varied.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in pandemic vaccination policy and practice might relate to variation in perception of vaccine efficacy and safety, operational issues related to vaccine manufacturing and procurement, and vaccination campaign systems. Increased monitoring of pandemic influenza vaccine coverage of pregnant women is recommended to enable evaluation of the vaccine safety in pregnancy and pandemic vaccination campaign effectiveness.
Mots-clé
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use, Europe/epidemiology, Female, Humans, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology, Influenza, Human/epidemiology, Influenza, Human/prevention & control, Policy Making, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
26/01/2016 9:55
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:55
Données d'usage