How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration.
Détails
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_D4C2B3BC679E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration.
Périodique
Implementation Science
ISSN
1748-5908 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1748-5908
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Volume
6
Numéro
68
Pages
1-5
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: epublish. Document Type: Article. Type de document PDF: MEETING REPORT.
Résumé
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in healthcare. We aimed to set a research agenda about promoting shared decision-making through continuing professional development.
METHODS: Thirty-six participants met for two days.
RESULTS: Participants suggested ways to improve an environmental scan that had inventoried 53 shared decision-making training programs from 14 countries. Their proposed research agenda included reaching an international consensus on shared decision-making competencies and creating a framework for accrediting continuing professional development initiatives in shared decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shared decision-making training programs showcases the need for quality assurance frameworks.
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in healthcare. We aimed to set a research agenda about promoting shared decision-making through continuing professional development.
METHODS: Thirty-six participants met for two days.
RESULTS: Participants suggested ways to improve an environmental scan that had inventoried 53 shared decision-making training programs from 14 countries. Their proposed research agenda included reaching an international consensus on shared decision-making competencies and creating a framework for accrediting continuing professional development initiatives in shared decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: Variability in shared decision-making training programs showcases the need for quality assurance frameworks.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
08/02/2012 17:45
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:54
Données d'usage
