Détection des lésions focales hépatiques malignes. Comparaison de l'échographie, de la porto-tomodensitométrie, de la tomodensitométrie tardive et de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique [Detection of malignant focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography during arterial portography, delayed computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging]

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D436A9544515
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Détection des lésions focales hépatiques malignes. Comparaison de l'échographie, de la porto-tomodensitométrie, de la tomodensitométrie tardive et de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique [Detection of malignant focal hepatic lesions. Comparison of ultrasonography, computerized tomography during arterial portography, delayed computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging]
Périodique
Gastroentérologie clinique et biologique
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Schneider F., Chapuis L., Gillet M., Leyvraz S., Schnyder P., Meuli R.
ISSN
0399-8320
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
1999
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
23
Numéro
1
Pages
105-13
Langue
français
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; English Abstract ; Journal Article - Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
AIMS: This study was performed to compare the sensitivity of ultrasonography, computerized tomography during arterial portography, delayed computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to detect focal liver lesions. Forty three patients with primary or secondary malignant liver lesions were studied prior to surgical intervention. METHODS: The results of the imaging studies were compared with intraoperative examination of the liver, intraoperative ultrasonography and pathology results (29 patients). In the non-operated (14 patients) group, we compared the number of lesions detected by each technique. RESULTS: One hundred and forty six lesions were detected. There was 84% sensitivity with computerized tomography during arterial portography, 61.3% with delayed scan, 63.3% with magnetic resonance imaging and 51% with ultrasonography in operated patients. In patients who did not undergo surgery, magnetic resonance imaging was more sensitive in detecting lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In operated and non-operated patients series, CT during arterial portography had the highest sensitivity, but magnetic resonance imaging had the most consistent overall results.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Portography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
10/04/2008 16:02
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:54
Données d'usage