Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations of a Delphi Consensus from the Focal Therapy Society.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D3E83875F4A4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations of a Delphi Consensus from the Focal Therapy Society.
Périodique
Minerva urology and nephrology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Marra G., Laguna M.P., Walz J., Pavlovich C.P., Bianco F., Gregg J., Lebastchi A.H., Lepor H., Macek P., Rais-Bahrami S., Robertson C., Rukstalis D., Salomon G., Ukimura O., Abreu A.L., Barbe Y., Cathelineau X., Gandaglia G., George A.K., Gomez Rivas J., Gupta R.T., Lawrentschuk N., Kasivisvanathan V., Lomas D., Malavaud B., Margolis D., Matsuoka Y., Mehralivand S., Moschini M., Oderda M., Orabi H., Rastinehad A.R., Remzi M., Schulman A., Shin T., Shiraishi T., Sidana A., Shoji S., Stabile A., Valerio M., Tammisetti V.S., Phin Tan W., VAN DEN Bos W., Villers A., Willemse P.P., DE LA Rosette J., Polascik T., Sanchez-Salas R.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
Focal Therapy Society
ISSN
2724-6442 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2724-6051
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
10/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
74
Numéro
5
Pages
581-589
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localized PCa.
A 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, 1) the current/present role; 2) the potential/future role; 3) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold.
Of 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (N.=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (N.=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (N.=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (N.=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localized PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority.
The present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject.
Mots-clé
Biomarkers, Consensus, Delphi Technique, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis, Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy, Surveys and Questionnaires
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
25/01/2021 8:31
Dernière modification de la notice
25/02/2023 6:46
Données d'usage