Voyager écolo : quelles recommandations ? [Eco-tourism: what recommendations?]

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: RMS_780_886.pdf (239.08 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_D25DF1A8DDFF
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Voyager écolo : quelles recommandations ? [Eco-tourism: what recommendations?]
Périodique
Revue medicale suisse
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Tan R., Emery N., Miauton A., Genton B., D'acremont V.
ISSN
1660-9379 (Print)
ISSN-L
1660-9379
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
04/05/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Numéro
780
Pages
886-889
Langue
français
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Which recommendations family doctors and travel health practitioners can provide to their patients, to reduce their environmental footprint when travelling? Avoiding flying is the biggest action a traveler can take to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Staying at eco-lodges, or carbon offsetting, may help, but one must be aware of false or exaggerated claims on their impact. Using UV light, filters, halogens or boiling water, are effective ways to disinfect water and reduce the waste created from plastic water bottles. Given the large carbon footprint of medications and laboratory exams, limiting prescription of antibiotics or antimalarials in pre-travel consultations, or limiting unnecessary laboratory exams in returning travelers by following the latest recommendations, could reduce greenhouse emissions of the medical practice.
Mots-clé
Antimalarials, Carbon Footprint, Humans, Referral and Consultation, Tourism, Travel
Pubmed
Création de la notice
13/05/2022 13:33
Dernière modification de la notice
16/08/2022 6:14
Données d'usage