Is it possible to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the French version of the hand function sort (HFS-F) for patients hospitalized in musculoskeletal rehabilitation?

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D1E186FBA913
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Is it possible to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the French version of the hand function sort (HFS-F) for patients hospitalized in musculoskeletal rehabilitation?
Périodique
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Benhissen Z., Konzelmann M., Vuistiner P., Leger B., Luthi F., Benaim C.
ISSN
1877-0665 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1877-0657
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
59S
Pages
e60
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: ARTICLEPublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: The HFS is a pictorial questionnaire with 62 items; it is a self-report functional capacity evaluation of the upper limb [1]. The MCID is important in assessing the effectiveness of a therapy. It has not been estimated for HFS-F [2]. The aim of this study was to estimate the MCID of the HFS-F for patients hospitalized in musculoskeletal rehabilitation for chronic pain of the upper limb. As a comparison, the MCID of the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) was also estimated.
MATERIAL/PATIENTS AND METHODS: French speaking patients (18-65 years), hospitalized from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015, various pathology of upper limb in the aftermath of an accident. The pain has at least lasted three months.
REPORTS: of HFS-F scores and DASH at the entrance and exit, of the global scale of change (Likert 7 levels) at the exit. The MCID was estimated using two methods: the subjective feeling of patient (ANOVA-ROC) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement: SEM).
RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty five patients were enrolled, 82% men, age 43±12 years, 65% proximal damage (shoulder, elbow), 35% distal damage (hand-wrist). The difference of the scores in subjectively improved patients was 26/248 (ANOVA, P<10(-4)), the values of sensitivity/specificity were 0.51-0.81 for the threshold values of MCID between 25/248 and 30/248 (area under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.72 [0.65-0.78]). The SEM gave a value of 28/248. The difference in the DASH scores in subjectively improved patients was-12/100 (P<10(-4)), corresponding to the MCID commonly accepted for this questionnaire [3], the values of sensitivity/specificity were 0.25-0.54 for DASH values of-13/100 at-11/100 (AUC=0.31 [0.24-0.37]).
DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION: Both used methods are consistent to propose a MCID forHFS-Fbetween 25/248 and 30/248, corresponding to 11% improvement of the score. This estimate is useful in clinical practice. In this sample, the DASH seems less relevant to determine patients subjectively improved.
Pubmed
Création de la notice
29/09/2016 17:37
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:52
Données d'usage