Dual-Split CT to Simulate Multiple Radiation Doses From a Single Scan-Liver Lesion Detection Compared With Dose-Matched Single-Energy CT.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D176522C20B2
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Dual-Split CT to Simulate Multiple Radiation Doses From a Single Scan-Liver Lesion Detection Compared With Dose-Matched Single-Energy CT.
Périodique
Investigative radiology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Racine D., Niemann T., Nemeth B., Manzano L.G., Alkadhi H., Viry A., Kubik-Huch R.A., Frauenfelder T., Euler A.
ISSN
1536-0210 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0020-9996
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/02/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
60
Numéro
2
Pages
131-137
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Comparative Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential use of simulated radiation doses from a dual-split CT scan for dose optimization by comparing their lesion detectability to dose-matched single-energy CT acquisitions at different radiation dose levels using a mathematical model observer.
An anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with liver lesions (5-10 mm, both hyperattenuating and hypoattenuating) was imaged using a third-generation dual-source CT in single-energy dual-source mode at 100 kVp and 3 radiation doses (5, 2.5, 1.25 mGy). The tube current was 67% for tube A and 33% for tube B. For each dose, 5 simulated radiation doses (100%, 67%, 55%, 45%, 39%, and 33%) were generated through linear image blending. The phantom was also imaged using traditional single-source single-energy mode at equivalent doses. Each setup was repeated 10 times. Image noise texture was evaluated by the average spatial frequency (f av ) of the noise power spectrum. Liver lesion detection was measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), using a channelized Hotelling model observer with 10 dense Gaussian channels.
F av decreased at lower radiation doses and differed between simulated and single-energy images (eg, 0.16 mm -1 vs 0.14 mm -1 for simulated and single-energy images at 1.25 mGy), indicating slightly blotchier noise texture for dual-split CT. For hyperattenuating lesions, the mean AUC ranged between 0.92-0.99, 0.81-0.96, and 0.68-0.89 for single-energy, and between 0.91-0.99, 0.78-0.91, and 0.70-0.85 for dual-split at 5 mGy, 2.5 mGy, and 1.25 mGy, respectively. For hypoattenuating lesions, the AUC ranged between 0.90-0.98, 0.75-0.93, and 0.69-0.86 for the single-energy, and between 0.92-0.99, 0.76-0.87, and 0.67-0.81 for dual-split at 5 mGy, 2.5 mGy, and 1.25 mGy, respectively. AUC values were similar between both modes at 5 mGy, and slightly lower, albeit not significantly, for the dual-split mode at 2.5 and 1.25 mGy.
Lesion detectability was comparable between multiple simulated radiation doses from a dual-split CT scan and dose-matched single-energy CT. Noise texture was slightly blotchier in the simulated images. Simulated doses using dual-split CT can be used to assess the impact of radiation dose reduction on lesion detectability without the need for repeated patient scans.
Mots-clé
Radiation Dosage, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods, Phantoms, Imaging, Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection/methods, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Simulation, Liver/diagnostic imaging
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
05/08/2024 15:37
Dernière modification de la notice
21/01/2025 7:10
Données d'usage