National survey on abdominal trauma practices of pediatric surgeons.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_D0F5B55C7343
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
National survey on abdominal trauma practices of pediatric surgeons.
Périodique
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
ISSN
1439-359X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0939-7248
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2010
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
20
Numéro
5
Pages
334-338
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Case Reports ; Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Bibliomics (AP)
Bibliomics (AP)
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric blunt abdominal trauma is a frequent reason for hospital admission, but there are no established guidelines to assess these patients. Our study aims to evaluate the diagnostic process used by pediatric surgeons in Switzerland to evaluate abdominal trauma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A scenario-based survey was carried out among Swiss pediatric surgeons. Respondents were asked to report on their management of children with blunt abdominal trauma.
RESULTS: The response rate was 46% (26 of 54). The clinical signs considered the most important were abdominal examination and palpation (100%), auscultation (81%), external genital exam (77%) and Glasgow Coma Scale (77%). The most frequent laboratory exams requested were urine analysis (100%), complete blood count (96%), liver function tests (85%) and coagulation tests (77%). 42% of the physicians asked for an abdominal ultrasound for every patient with blunt abdominal trauma. 58% reported that some patients do not need a CT scan despite anomalies in the initial workup. There were significant variations in the clinical assessment of patients with minor blunt abdominal trauma. Abnormal ultrasounds, but not abnormal liver functions tests, prompted clinicians to obtain CT scans. When evaluating the probability of organ injury after a full workup, clinicians relied on the results of the ultrasound but not on liver function tests. A normal CT scan did not appear to reassure physicians if the patient still presented with mild abdominal pain.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the clinical assessment, request for laboratory tests and use of radiological exams among Swiss pediatric surgeons. Further studies are required on the evaluation of abdominal organ injuries in children.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A scenario-based survey was carried out among Swiss pediatric surgeons. Respondents were asked to report on their management of children with blunt abdominal trauma.
RESULTS: The response rate was 46% (26 of 54). The clinical signs considered the most important were abdominal examination and palpation (100%), auscultation (81%), external genital exam (77%) and Glasgow Coma Scale (77%). The most frequent laboratory exams requested were urine analysis (100%), complete blood count (96%), liver function tests (85%) and coagulation tests (77%). 42% of the physicians asked for an abdominal ultrasound for every patient with blunt abdominal trauma. 58% reported that some patients do not need a CT scan despite anomalies in the initial workup. There were significant variations in the clinical assessment of patients with minor blunt abdominal trauma. Abnormal ultrasounds, but not abnormal liver functions tests, prompted clinicians to obtain CT scans. When evaluating the probability of organ injury after a full workup, clinicians relied on the results of the ultrasound but not on liver function tests. A normal CT scan did not appear to reassure physicians if the patient still presented with mild abdominal pain.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the clinical assessment, request for laboratory tests and use of radiological exams among Swiss pediatric surgeons. Further studies are required on the evaluation of abdominal organ injuries in children.
Mots-clé
Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis, Abdominal Injuries/surgery, Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Liver Function Tests, Male, Physician's Practice Patterns, hic" UI="D013557">Switzerland, Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis, Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
21/02/2015 10:18
Dernière modification de la notice
12/04/2024 13:03