Can MRI replace CT in evaluating semicircular canal dehiscence?

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D0D28CF05B93
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Can MRI replace CT in evaluating semicircular canal dehiscence?
Périodique
Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Browaeys P., Larson T.L., Wong M.L., Patel U.
ISSN
1936-959X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0195-6108
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Volume
34
Numéro
7
Pages
1421-1427
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with symptoms of semicircular canal dehiscence often undergo both CT and MR imaging. We assessed whether FIESTA can replace temporal bone CT in evaluating patients for SC dehiscence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 112 consecutive patients (224 ears) with vestibulocochlear symptoms who underwent concurrent MR imaging and CT of the temporal bones between 2007 and 2009. MR imaging protocol included a FIESTA sequence covering the temporal bone (axial 0.8-mm section thickness, 0.4-mm spacing, coronal/oblique reformations; 41 patients at 1.5T, 71 patients at 3T). CT was performed on a 64-row multidetector row scanner (0.625-mm axial acquisition, with coronal/oblique reformations). Both ears of each patient were evaluated for dehiscence of the superior and posterior semicircular canals in consensual fashion by 2 neuroradiologists. Analysis of the FIESTA sequence and reformations was performed first for the MR imaging evaluation. CT evaluation was performed at least 2 weeks after the MR imaging review, resulting in a blinded comparison of CT with MR imaging. CT was used as the reference standard to evaluate the MR imaging results.
RESULTS: For SSC dehiscence, MR imaging sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 96.5%, positive predictive value was 61.1%, and negative predictive value was 100% in comparison with CT. For PSC dehiscence, MR imaging sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 99.1%, positive predictive value was 33.3%, and negative predictive value was 100% in comparison with CT.
CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging, with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, conclusively excludes SSC or PSC dehiscence. Negative findings on MR imaging preclude the need for CT to detect SC dehiscence. Only patients with positive findings on MR imaging should undergo CT evaluation.
Mots-clé
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dizziness/diagnosis, Dizziness/radiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hearing Loss/diagnosis, Hearing Loss/radiography, Humans, Image Enhancement/methods, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods, Labyrinth Diseases/diagnosis, Labyrinth Diseases/radiography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Semicircular Canals/pathology, Semicircular Canals/radiography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Single-Blind Method, Temporal Bone/radiography, Tinnitus/diagnosis, Tinnitus/radiography, Tomography, Spiral Computed/methods, Vertigo/diagnosis, Vertigo/radiography, Young Adult
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
07/02/2014 22:00
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:51
Données d'usage