A treatment strategy to help select patients who may not need secondary intervention to remove symptomatic ureteral stones after previous stenting.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D0C306B12BCF
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A treatment strategy to help select patients who may not need secondary intervention to remove symptomatic ureteral stones after previous stenting.
Périodique
World journal of urology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Stojkova Gafner E., Grüter T., Furrer M.A., Bosshard P., Kiss B., Vartolomei M.D., Roth B.
ISSN
1433-8726 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0724-4983
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Numéro
11
Pages
2955-2961
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed at evaluating whether removal of the ureteral stent the day before scheduled secondary intervention facilitates spontaneous ureteral stone passage and thus can spare the pre-stented patient this surgery.
Retrospective analysis of a single-centre consecutive series of 216 patients after previous stenting due to a symptomatic ureteral stone from 01/2013 to 01/2018. Indwelling stents were removed under local anaesthesia. Patients were told to filter their urine overnight. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage.
34% (74/216) of patients had spontaneous stone passage while the stent was indwelling. Of the remaining 142 patients, 41% (58/142) had spontaneous stone passage within 24 h after stent removal. Only 84/216 (39%) patients needed secondary intervention. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of all 216 patients showed a significant association between spontaneous stone passage and smaller stone size (p < 0.001), distal stone location (p = 0.046) and stent dwell time (p = 0.02). Predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage after stent removal were smaller size (p < 0.001), distal location (p = 0.001), and stone movement while the stent was indwelling (p = 0.016). A treatment strategy was established that helps select patients suitable for conservative management.
The majority (61%) of ureteral stones passed spontaneously after pre-stenting; 34% while the stent was indwelling, 27% within 24 h after stent removal. Besides distal stone location, stone size (< 6 mm) and stone movement (≥ 5 cm) while the stent is indwelling indicate patients who are likely to pass their ureteral stone spontaneously after stent removal. The treatment strategy (decision tree) presented here helps identify those patients.
https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12112914 .
Mots-clé
Double J, Pre-stenting, Spontaneous stone passage, Ureteral stone, Urolithiasis
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
23/01/2020 15:18
Dernière modification de la notice
09/01/2021 6:26
Données d'usage