Practice Guidelines for Evaluation of Fever in Returning Travelers and Migrants

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_D02714E47681
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Practice Guidelines for Evaluation of Fever in Returning Travelers and Migrants
Périodique
Journal of Travel Medicine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
D'Acremont Valérie, Burnand Bernard, Ambresin Ann-Emmanuelle, Genton Blaise
ISSN
1195-1982
ISSN-L
1195-1982
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
08/03/2006
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
10
Numéro
Suppl. 2
Pages
S25-S45
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Guideline ; Journal Article ; Practice Guideline ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Fever upon return from tropical or subtropical regions can be caused by diseases that are rapidly fatal if left untreated. The differential diagnosis is wide. Physicians often lack the necessary knowledge to appropriately take care of such patients.
OBJECTIVE: To develop practice guidelines for the initial evaluation of patients presenting with fever upon return from a tropical or subtropical country in order to reduce delays and potential fatal outcomes and to improve knowledge of physicians.
TARGET AUDIENCE: Medical personnel, usually physicians, who see the returning patients, primarily in an ambulatory setting or in an emergency department of a hospital and specialists in internal medicine, infectious diseases, and travel medicine.
METHOD: A systematic review of the literature--mainly extracted from the National Library of Medicine database--was performed between May 2000 and April 2001, using the keywords fever and/or travel and/or migrant and/or guidelines. Eventually, 250 articles were reviewed. The relevant elements of evidence were used in combination with expert knowledge to construct an algorithm with arborescence flagging the level of specialization required to deal with each situation. The proposed diagnoses and treatment plans are restricted to tropical or subtropical diseases (nonautochthonous diseases). The decision chart is accompanied with a detailed document that provides for each level of the tree the degree of evidence and the grade of recommendation as well as the key points of debate. PARTICIPANTS AND CONSENSUS PROCESS: Besides the 4 authors (2 specialists in travel/tropical medicine, 1 clinical epidemiologist, and 1 resident physician), a panel of 11 European physicians with different levels of expertise on travel medicine reviewed the guidelines. Thereafter, each point of the proposed recommendations was discussed with 15 experts in travel/tropical medicine from various continents. A final version was produced and submitted for evaluation to all participants.
CONCLUSION: Although the quality of evidence was limited by the paucity of clinical studies, these guidelines established with the support of a large and highly experienced panel should help physicians to deal with patients coming back from the Tropics with fever.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
28/01/2008 11:49
Dernière modification de la notice
24/05/2024 6:05
Données d'usage