Single rooms may help to prevent nosocomial bloodstream infection and cross-transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units
Détails
Télécharger: BIB_CD98BF7544D1.P001.pdf (175.19 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_CD98BF7544D1
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Single rooms may help to prevent nosocomial bloodstream infection and cross-transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units
Périodique
Intensive Care Medicine
ISSN
0342-4642 (Print)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2007
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
33
Numéro
5
Pages
836-40
Langue
anglais
Notes
Journal Article --- Old month value: May
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: Nosocomial infections remain a major problem in intensive care units. Several authorities have recommended housing patients in single rooms to prevent cross-transmission of potential pathogens, but this issue is currently debated. The aim of the present study was to compare the rate of nosocomial cross-contamination between patients hosted in single rooms versus bay rooms. DESIGN: Prospective observational data acquisition over 2.5 years. SETTING: A 14-bed medico-surgical ICU, composed of six single-bed rooms plus a six-bed and a two-bed bay room served by the same staff. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted from 1 July 2002 to 31 December 2004. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in admitted patients was 1.1% and acquisition rate 2.4%. The incidence density of MRSA acquisition was 4.1 [95% CI 2.7-6.3]/1,000 patient-days in bay rooms versus 1.3 [0.5-3.4]/1,000 patient-days in single rooms (p<0.001). Pseudomonas spp. acquisition rate was 3.9 [2.5-6.1]/1,000 patient-days in bay rooms versus 0.7 [0.2-2.4]/1,000 patient-days in single rooms (p<0.001), and Candida spp. colonization was 38.4 [33.3-44.1]/1,000 patient-days in bay rooms versus 13.8 [10.2-18.6]/1,000 patient-days (p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, the relative risk of MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida spp. acquisition in single rooms or cubicles versus bay rooms was 0.65, 0.61 and 0.75 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in an institution where MRSA is not hyperendemic, infection control measures may be more effective to prevent cross-transmission of microorganisms in patients housed in single rooms.
Mots-clé
Aged Cross Infection/epidemiology/*prevention & control Female Humans Infection Control/*methods *Intensive Care Units Male *Methicillin Resistance Middle Aged Patients' Rooms/*organization & administration Quebec/epidemiology Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology/*prevention & control
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
24/01/2008 16:57
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:48