Impact of primary endoscopic resection on oncological outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer: a retrospective propensity score-based cohort study.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_CBAD651A8504
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Impact of primary endoscopic resection on oncological outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer: a retrospective propensity score-based cohort study.
Périodique
Surgical endoscopy
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Teixeira-Farinha H., Béhal H., Cailliau E., Pasquer A., Duhamel A., Théréaux J., Chalret du Rieu M., Lefevre J.H., Turner K., Mantziari S., Collet D., Piessen G., Gronnier C.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
FREGAT Network-AFC Working Group
ISSN
1432-2218 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0930-2794
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Numéro
9
Pages
5169-5177
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Esophageal cancer posed significant global health challenges, particularly due to poor survival rates, especially in advanced stages. Primary endoscopic resection had emerged as an alternative treatment for early esophageal cancer, aiming to preserve organ function and reduce surgical morbidity.
This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 334 patients with early esophageal cancer (T1a-b, N0) from 30 French-speaking European centers between 2000 and 2010. Patients underwent either primary endoscopic resection followed by esophagectomy (E group, n = 36) or esophagectomy alone (S group, n = 298). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for TNM stage and propensity score weighting were used to assess the impact of primary endoscopic resection on recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications.
Primary endoscopic resection did not significantly influence RFS (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.68, p = 0.88) or OS (adjusted HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.13, p = 0.92) compared to esophagectomy alone. Initial higher thromboembolic complications in the endoscopic resection group were not significant after adjustment (adjusted OR 4.73, 95% CI 0.34 to 64.27, p = 0.24).
Primary endoscopic resection followed by esophagectomy for early esophageal cancer did not alter oncological outcomes or overall survival in this retrospective cohort. These findings supported the role of primary endoscopic resection as a safe initial treatment strategy, warranting validation in larger prospective studies.
Our study was registered retrospectively on the Clinicaltrials.com website under the identifier NCT01927016. We acknowledge the importance of prospective registration and regret that this was not done before the commencement of the study.
Mots-clé
Humans, Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery, Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology, Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality, Esophagectomy/methods, Retrospective Studies, Female, Male, Propensity Score, Middle Aged, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Esophagoscopy/methods, Endoscopic resection, Esophageal cancer, Esophagectomy, Oncological outcomes
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
26/07/2024 13:10
Dernière modification de la notice
10/09/2024 6:17
Données d'usage