Comparison of vitality states of finishers and withdrawers in trail running: An enactive and phenomenological perspective.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 28282421_BIB_CB0434130952.pdf (1345.57 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_CB0434130952
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of vitality states of finishers and withdrawers in trail running: An enactive and phenomenological perspective.
Périodique
PloS one
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Rochat N., Hauw D., Antonini Philippe R., Crettaz von Roten F., Seifert L.
ISSN
1932-6203 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1932-6203
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Numéro
3
Pages
e0173667
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Studies on ultra-endurance suggest that during the races, athletes typically experience three vitality states (i.e., preservation, loss, and revival) at the phenomenological level. Nevertheless, how these states contribute to the management and outcome of performance remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether and how the vitality states experienced by runners and their evolution during a trail race can be used to distinguish finishers from withdrawers. From an enactive and phenomenological framework, we processed enactive interviews and blog posts of race narratives. We distinguished units of meaning, which were grouped into sequences of experience; each sequence was then categorized as one of the three vitality states: state of vitality preservation (SVP), state of vitality loss (SVL) or state of vitality revival (SVR). We analyzed the distribution of these vitality states and their temporal organization at the beginning, in the second and third quarters, and at the end of the races, and we qualitatively characterized runners' adaptations to SVL. Results showed that finishers completed the race in SVP, with overall significantly more sequences in SVP and significantly fewer sequences in SVL than withdrawers. SVR did not discriminate finishers from withdrawers. The temporal organization of the vitality states showed a significant difference in the emergence of SVP from the second quarter of the race, as well as a significant difference in the emergence of SVL from the third quarter of the race. The analysis of adaptations to SVL confirmed that finishers were more capable of exiting SVL by enacting a preservation world when they felt physical or psychological alerts, whereas withdrawers remained in SVL. Our results showed that finishers and withdrawers did not enact the same phenomenological worlds in the race situation, especially in the organization of vitality adaptations and their relationships to difficulties; the cumulative effect of the succession of experienced vitality states differed, as well.

Mots-clé
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Athletes, Athletic Performance, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Endurance/physiology, Running/physiology, Running/psychology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
21/03/2017 19:47
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:45
Données d'usage