Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_CAA56AC492C7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society Recommendations.
Périodique
World Journal of Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Lassen K., Coolsen M.M., Slim K., Carli F., de Aguilar-Nascimento J.E., Schäfer M., Parks R.W., Fearon K.C., Lobo D.N., Demartines N., Braga M., Ljungqvist O., Dejong C.H.
ISSN
1432-2323 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0364-2313
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
37
Numéro
2
Pages
240-258
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish. PDF type de document: Guidelines
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Protocols for enhanced recovery provide comprehensive and evidence-based guidelines for best perioperative care. Protocol implementation may reduce complication rates and enhance functional recovery and, as a result of this, also reduce length-of-stay in hospital. There is no comprehensive framework available for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: An international working group constructed within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society constructed a comprehensive and evidence-based framework for best perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Data were retrieved from standard databases and personal archives. Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the GRADE system and reached through consensus in the group. The quality of evidence was rated "high", "moderate", "low" or "very low". Recommendations were graded as "strong" or "weak".
RESULTS: Comprehensive guidelines are presented. Available evidence is summarised and recommendations given for 27 care items. The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence-based guidelines provide the necessary platform upon which to base a unified protocol for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy. A unified protocol allows for comparison between centres and across national borders. It facilitates multi-institutional prospective cohort registries and adequately powered randomised trials.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
06/02/2013 11:59
Dernière modification de la notice
08/06/2023 6:54
Données d'usage