Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: an international Delphi study of expert users.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: s00464-023-10001-4.pdf (614.21 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_C90BF4A751CC
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Robot-assisted pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: an international Delphi study of expert users.
Périodique
Surgical endoscopy
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Simoncini T., Panattoni A., Aktas M., Ampe J., Betschart C., Bloemendaal ALA, Buse S., Campagna G., Caretto M., Cervigni M., Consten ECJ, Davila H.H., Dubuisson J., Espin-Basany E., Fabiani B., Faucheron J.L., Giannini A., Gurland B., Hahnloser D., Joukhadar R., Mannella P., Mereu L., Martellucci J., Meurette G., Montt Guevara M.M., Ratto C., O'Reilly B.A., Reisenauer C., Russo E., Schraffordt Koops S., Siddiqi S., Sturiale A., Naldini G.
ISSN
1432-2218 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0930-2794
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
07/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
37
Numéro
7
Pages
5215-5225
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Robotic surgery has gained popularity for the reconstruction of pelvic floor defects. Nonetheless, there is no evidence that robot-assisted reconstructive surgery is either appropriate or superior to standard laparoscopy for the performance of pelvic floor reconstructive procedures or that it is sustainable. The aim of this project was to address the proper role of robotic pelvic floor reconstructive procedures using expert opinion.
We set up an international, multidisciplinary group of 26 experts to participate in a Delphi process on robotics as applied to pelvic floor reconstructive surgery. The group comprised urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons with long-term experience in the performance of pelvic floor reconstructive procedures and with the use of the robot, who were identified primarily based on peer-reviewed publications. Two rounds of the Delphi process were conducted. The first included 63 statements pertaining to surgeons' characteristics, general questions, indications, surgical technique, and future-oriented questions. A second round including 20 statements was used to reassess those statements where borderline agreement was obtained during the first round. The final step consisted of a face-to-face meeting with all participants to present and discuss the results of the analysis.
The 26 experts agreed that robotics is a suitable indication for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery because of the significant technical advantages that it confers relative to standard laparoscopy. Experts considered these advantages particularly important for the execution of complex reconstructive procedures, although the benefits can be found also during less challenging cases. The experts considered the robot safe and effective for pelvic floor reconstruction and generally thought that the additional costs are offset by the increased surgical efficacy.
Robotics is a suitable choice for pelvic reconstruction, but this Delphi initiative calls for more research to objectively assess the specific settings where robotic surgery would provide the most benefit.
Mots-clé
Humans, Robotics, Pelvic Floor/surgery, Delphi Technique, Surgery, Plastic, Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods, Laparoscopy/methods, Delphi consensus, Pelvic floor reconstructive surgery, Pelvic organ prolapse, Rectal prolapse, Robotic surgery
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
24/03/2023 12:49
Dernière modification de la notice
18/07/2023 6:56
Données d'usage