Surgical management of infected permanent transvenous pacemaker systems: ten year experience
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_C82DE70454A9
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Etude de cas (case report): rapporte une observation et la commente brièvement.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Surgical management of infected permanent transvenous pacemaker systems: ten year experience
Périodique
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
ISSN
0886-0440
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
06/1996
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
3
Pages
180-6
Notes
Case Reports
Journal Article --- Old month value: May-Jun
Journal Article --- Old month value: May-Jun
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Between January 1985 and June 1995, more than 1800 consecutive patients underwent implantation of a new permanent cardiac pacemaker at our institution. Thirty-six patients (0.02%) had 45 reinterventions for infected pacemaker systems. METHODS: in group A, 24 of 27 patients received simultaneous implantation of a new pacemaker. One had reimplantation of the same pacemaker in the same pocket, and two did not require reimplantation. The leads were retained in 19 (70%) of the patients. In group B, nine patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass or "pursestring" surgery for removal of an infected pacemaker; a new epicardial pacemaker system was simultaneously implanted in seven patients. RESULTS: Identification of an infectious agent failed in 17 patients (47%), and Staphylococci were found in 15 patients (42%). The time from pacemaker implantation to onset of infection ranged from 1 month to 11 years (mean 31 months; median 19 months) and the time from onset of infection to surgical treatment from 1 month to 7 years (mean 7 months; median 2 months). The mean follow-up time is 74 months (range, 1 month to 10 years; median 5 years). There were 9 reoperations in 3 patients (16%) of group A for recurrent infection of their retained leads ultimately necessitating the use of open cardiac surgery. There was no early death; six patients died late due to unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal of all pacemaker leads is recommended; open heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is indicated in selected cases and is effective and safe.
Mots-clé
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Child
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infection/*etiology/*surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial/*adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Staphylococcal Infections/etiology/surgery
Time Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
14/02/2008 14:17
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:43