Surgical management of infected permanent transvenous pacemaker systems: ten year experience

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_C82DE70454A9
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Etude de cas (case report): rapporte une observation et la commente brièvement.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Surgical management of infected permanent transvenous pacemaker systems: ten year experience
Périodique
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Vogt  P. R., Sagdic  K., Lachat  M., Candinas  R., von Segesser  L. K., Turina  M. I.
ISSN
0886-0440
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
06/1996
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
3
Pages
180-6
Notes
Case Reports
Journal Article --- Old month value: May-Jun
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Between January 1985 and June 1995, more than 1800 consecutive patients underwent implantation of a new permanent cardiac pacemaker at our institution. Thirty-six patients (0.02%) had 45 reinterventions for infected pacemaker systems. METHODS: in group A, 24 of 27 patients received simultaneous implantation of a new pacemaker. One had reimplantation of the same pacemaker in the same pocket, and two did not require reimplantation. The leads were retained in 19 (70%) of the patients. In group B, nine patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass or "pursestring" surgery for removal of an infected pacemaker; a new epicardial pacemaker system was simultaneously implanted in seven patients. RESULTS: Identification of an infectious agent failed in 17 patients (47%), and Staphylococci were found in 15 patients (42%). The time from pacemaker implantation to onset of infection ranged from 1 month to 11 years (mean 31 months; median 19 months) and the time from onset of infection to surgical treatment from 1 month to 7 years (mean 7 months; median 2 months). The mean follow-up time is 74 months (range, 1 month to 10 years; median 5 years). There were 9 reoperations in 3 patients (16%) of group A for recurrent infection of their retained leads ultimately necessitating the use of open cardiac surgery. There was no early death; six patients died late due to unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal of all pacemaker leads is recommended; open heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is indicated in selected cases and is effective and safe.
Mots-clé
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cardiopulmonary Bypass Child Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Infection/*etiology/*surgery Male Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial/*adverse effects Retrospective Studies Staphylococcal Infections/etiology/surgery Time Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
14/02/2008 14:17
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:43
Données d'usage