Appropriateness of initial treatment for severe Crohn's disease: application of EPACT criteria to the EC-IBD European cohort

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_C3993BDC6E7A
Type
Actes de conférence (partie): contribution originale à la littérature scientifique, publiée à l'occasion de conférences scientifiques, dans un ouvrage de compte-rendu (proceedings), ou dans l'édition spéciale d'un journal reconnu (conference proceedings).
Sous-type
Abstract (résumé de présentation): article court qui reprend les éléments essentiels présentés à l'occasion d'une conférence scientifique dans un poster ou lors d'une intervention orale.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Appropriateness of initial treatment for severe Crohn's disease: application of EPACT criteria to the EC-IBD European cohort
Titre de la conférence
Digestive Disease Week and 109th Annual Meeting of the AGA Institute, May 17-22, 2008, San Diego
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Juillerat Pascal, Pittet Valérie, Froehlich Florian, Gonvers Jean-Jacques, Mottet Christian, Felley Christian, Burnand Bernard, Vader John-Paul, Stockbruegger R., Michetti Pierre
ISBN
0016-5085
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
134
Série
Gastroenterology
Pages
A-474
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Background: The appropriateness of use of therapy for severe active luminal Crohn's disease (CD) cases has never been formally assessed. The European panel on the appropriateness of Crohn's disease therapy [EPACT (http://www.epact.ch)] developed appropriateness criteria. We have applied these criteria to the EC-IBD prospectively assembled, uniformly diagnosed European population-based inception cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients diagnosed between 1991 and 1993.
Methods: 426 CD patients from 13 European participating centers (10 countries) were included at the time of diagnosis (first flare, naive patients, no maintenance treatment, no steroids). We used the EPACT definition of the severe active luminal CD, agreed upon by the panel experts (acute flare, hospitalized patient, without documented fistula or stenosis and who did not undergo surgery for abscess drainage or a fistulectomy). The various treatments were analyzed to determine the appropriateness of the medical decision, according to the EPACT criteria.
Results: 84 (20%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Considering at least one appropriate (A) treatment as appropriate: 60 patients (71%) received an appropriate treatment, 24 patients (29%) an inappropriate treatment (I). Furthermore, in 87% of the cases with one appropriate treatment an additional mostly inappropriate treatment was added or continued. Detailed results are indicated in the table below.
Conclusion: In the EC-IBD cohort, the treatment for severe active luminal CD was appropriate for more than 70% of the patients, but frequently an inappropriate treatment was continued or added, thus increasing the risk of adverse reactions, drugs interactions and costs.
Création de la notice
11/03/2009 11:18
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:38
Données d'usage