Belgian experience with triple therapy with boceprevir and telaprevir in genotype 1 infected patients who inject drugs.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_C2B5C532A8EA
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Belgian experience with triple therapy with boceprevir and telaprevir in genotype 1 infected patients who inject drugs.
Périodique
Journal of Medical Virology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Arain A., Bourgeois S., de Galocsy C., Henrion J., Deltenre P., d'Heygere F., George C., Bastens B., Van Overbeke L., Verrando R., Bruckers L., Mathei C., Buntinx F., Van Vlierberghe H., Francque S., Laleman W., Moreno C., Janssens F., Nevens F., Robaeys G.
ISSN
1096-9071 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0146-6615
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2016
Volume
88
Numéro
1
Pages
94-99
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
No data have been reported yet on treatment outcome in persons who inject drugs (PWID) infected with hepatitis C virus treated with boceprevir or telaprevir in combination with peginterferon (Peg IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). Additionally, there are concerns about the safety of boceprevir and telaprevir in some subgroups of patients with hepatitis C (HCV). In a cohort of HCV patients infected with genotype 1 in Belgium, treatment outcome of patients infected due to IV drug use was analyzed and compared with patients who have no history of substance use. The study population consisted of 179 patients: 78 PWID and 101 controls treated with boceprevir (n = 79) or telaprevir (n = 100) additional to Peg IFN and RBV; 53 (30%) had advanced disease (F3, F4) and 79 (44%) had an antiviral therapy previously. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between both groups, except that PWID patients were more frequently infected with genotype 1a (67% vs 21%), were younger and were predominantly male. Psychiatric complaints during follow-up occurred more frequently in the PWID patients: 24% versus 11% (P = .02). Treatment failure for other reasons than absence of viral response was 70% and 64% in PWID and non-PWID respectively. The sustained viral response (SVR) rates were similar in both groups (71% in PWID vs 72% in non-PWID); with a non-inferiority test with -5% margin there is a difference of -1% (95% CI [-15%, 13%]) and P = 0.30. There are no reasons to exclude PWID from treatment with boceprevir, telaprevir and novel antiviral therapies. J. Med. Virol. 88:94-99, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
03/12/2015 15:32
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:37
Données d'usage