Comparison of transhiatal laparoscopy versus blind closed-chest cervicotomy and laparotomy for esophagectomy in children.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_C17B17FE78E4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of transhiatal laparoscopy versus blind closed-chest cervicotomy and laparotomy for esophagectomy in children.
Périodique
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Vasseur Maurer S., de Buys Roessingh A., Reinberg O.
ISSN
1531-5037 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0022-3468
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Volume
48
Numéro
4
Pages
887-892
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish. PDF type: Operative Technique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement for caustic stenosis in children poses a challenging surgical problem. Blind removal of the injured esophagus without thoracotomy through a left cervical and transhiatal approach followed by an orthotopic esophageal replacement using either the colon or the stomach is a difficult procedure and can be dangerous in children. We performed our first total laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy in February 2007. We aim to compare this new technique to the previously applied method of blind closed-chest esophagectomy through a cervicotomy and laparotomy.
METHODS: We analyzed the surgery and follow-up of 40 children operated upon for extensive irreversible caustic burns of the esophagus. The first 20 esophageal replacements were performed following a blind dissection of the mediastinum through a cervical incision and a laparotomy for esophagectomy (Group I). The last 20 esophageal replacements were performed after laparoscopic transhiatal dissection in the mediastinum and cervicotomy in the neck for esophagectomy (Group II). All operations were performed under the supervision of the same senior surgeon.
RESULTS: Average age at the time of surgery was the same in both groups. Total esophagectomy was achieved in 45.0% of cases in Group I versus in 90.0% of cases in Group II. Colon was used in 80.0% of cases in Group I and in 90.0% in Group II. The mean duration of surgery was one hour longer in the laparoscopy group. One vascular injury was reported in the blind laparotomy group. Pneumothorax was more frequent in Group II without significant consequences besides drainage. Average time of extubation was about the same in both groups (1.8days).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for caustic burns before esophageal replacement in children is safe and effective. It could avoid vascular and bronchial mediastinal injuries as the dissection is performed under direct visual control. The routine use of laparoscopic assistance by a senior surgeon improves the safety of esophageal dissection and reduces life-threatening complications.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
13/06/2013 17:21
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:36
Données d'usage