Impact of lorlatinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_BF557DCD51CA
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Impact of lorlatinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Périodique
Lung cancer
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Peters S., Shaw A.T., Besse B., Felip E., Solomon B.J., Soo R.A., Bearz A., Gadgeel S.M., Lin C.C., Kao S., Seto T., Masters E.T., Abbattista A., Clancy J.S., Thurm H., Reisman A., Peltz G., Ross Camidge D.
ISSN
1872-8332 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0169-5002
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
06/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
144
Pages
10-19
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase I ; Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a phase 1/2 study (NCT01970865) in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- or ROS1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with lorlatinib 100 mg once daily.
PRO measures, including global quality of life (QoL), functioning domains and symptoms, were assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the 13-item Lung Cancer (QLQ-LC13) module. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline were assessed. Percentages of patients showing improvement, stability or worsening on each scale were reported, with a change of ≥10 points considered clinically meaningful (CM).
255 patients completed baseline and ≥1 post-baseline PRO assessment. Most patients had CM improvement (42.4 %) or stable (38.0 %) scores for global QoL. Functioning domains with the greatest proportion of patients with improved scores were role (37.6 %) and emotional (36.9 %); only one domain had more patients showing worsening than improving function (cognitive [24.3 % vs 22.4 %]). Most patients showed improved or stable scores for disease-related symptoms. No QLQ-C30 symptom domains had more patients worsening than improving. Symptoms on the QLQ-C30 scale with the greatest proportion of patients with improved scores were fatigue (49.4 %) and insomnia (46.3 %). Four QLQ-LC13 domains had more patients worsening than improving (two most affected were peripheral neuropathy [37.3 % vs 13.7 %] and alopecia [19.2 % vs 13.3 %]). Symptoms on the QLQ-LC13 scale with the greatest proportion of patients with improved scores were cough (42.7 %) and pain in other parts (32.9 %).
Lorlatinib treatment showed CM improvement from baseline in global QOL that was maintained over time. Additionally, there were improvements in physical, emotional, social, and role functioning. Improvements were shown in appetite loss and key symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, cough and fatigue; a worsening in peripheral neuropathy was noted.
Mots-clé
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy, Humans, Lactams, Macrocyclic, Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, ALK, Lorlatinib, NSCLC, Patient-reported outcomes, QoL, ROS1
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
02/05/2020 15:09
Dernière modification de la notice
30/06/2021 6:34
Données d'usage