Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part I: Preoperative and intraoperative management.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 1-s2.0-S074879832030665X-main.pdf (1329.51 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_BEF676FB06F1
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part I: Preoperative and intraoperative management.
Périodique
European journal of surgical oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Hübner M., Kusamura S., Villeneuve L., Al-Niaimi A., Alyami M., Balonov K., Bell J., Bristow R., Guiral D.C., Fagotti A., Falcão LFR, Glehen O., Lambert L., Mack L., Muenster T., Piso P., Pocard M., Rau B., Sgarbura O., Somashekhar S.P., Wadhwa A., Altman A., Fawcett W., Veerapong J., Nelson G.
ISSN
1532-2157 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0748-7983
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
46
Numéro
12
Pages
2292-2310
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part I of the guidelines highlights preoperative and intraoperative management.
The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations.
Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items, No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma.
The present ERAS recommendations for CRS±HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS±HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.
Mots-clé
Cytoreductive surgery, Enhanced recovery, Guidelines, HIPEC, Perioperative care
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
15/09/2020 10:57
Dernière modification de la notice
25/01/2022 8:11
Données d'usage