Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT.
Détails
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_BDDA5B348F5F
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT.
Périodique
Investigative radiology
ISSN
1536-0210 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0020-9996
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/02/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
60
Numéro
2
Pages
114-122
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Development of spectral photon-counting computed tomography (SPCCT) for ultra-high-resolution coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to accurately evaluate the coronary arteries of very-high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of SPCCT against conventional CT for quantifying coronary stenosis in very-high-risk patients, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method.
In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, very-high-risk patients addressed for ICA following an acute coronary syndrome were consecutively included. CCTA was performed for each patient with both SPCCT and conventional CT before ICA within 3 days. Stenoses were assessed using the minimal diameter over proximal and distal diameters method for CCTA and the quantitative coronary angiography method for ICA. Intraclass correlation coefficients and mean errors were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a >50% diameter stenosis threshold. Reclassification rates for conventional CT and SPCCT were assessed according to CAD-RADS 2.0, using ICA as the gold standard.
Twenty-six coronary stenoses were identified in 26 patients (4 women [15%]; age 64 ± 8 years) with 19 (73%) above 50% and 9 (35%) equal or above 70%. The median stenosis value was 64% (interquartile range, 48%-73%). SPCCT showed a lower mean error (6% [5%, 8%]) than conventional CT (12% [9%, 16%]). SPCCT demonstrated greater sensitivity (100%) and specificity (90%) than conventional CT (75% and 50%, respectively). Ten (38%) stenoses were reclassified with SPCCT and one (4%) with conventional CT.
In very-high-risk patients, ultra-high-resolution SPCCT coronary angiography showed greater accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and led to more stenosis reclassifications than conventional CT.
In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, very-high-risk patients addressed for ICA following an acute coronary syndrome were consecutively included. CCTA was performed for each patient with both SPCCT and conventional CT before ICA within 3 days. Stenoses were assessed using the minimal diameter over proximal and distal diameters method for CCTA and the quantitative coronary angiography method for ICA. Intraclass correlation coefficients and mean errors were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a >50% diameter stenosis threshold. Reclassification rates for conventional CT and SPCCT were assessed according to CAD-RADS 2.0, using ICA as the gold standard.
Twenty-six coronary stenoses were identified in 26 patients (4 women [15%]; age 64 ± 8 years) with 19 (73%) above 50% and 9 (35%) equal or above 70%. The median stenosis value was 64% (interquartile range, 48%-73%). SPCCT showed a lower mean error (6% [5%, 8%]) than conventional CT (12% [9%, 16%]). SPCCT demonstrated greater sensitivity (100%) and specificity (90%) than conventional CT (75% and 50%, respectively). Ten (38%) stenoses were reclassified with SPCCT and one (4%) with conventional CT.
In very-high-risk patients, ultra-high-resolution SPCCT coronary angiography showed greater accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and led to more stenosis reclassifications than conventional CT.
Mots-clé
Humans, Female, Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Computed Tomography Angiography/methods, Prospective Studies, Coronary Angiography/methods, Sensitivity and Specificity, Aged, Reproducibility of Results
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
21/08/2024 8:29
Dernière modification de la notice
09/01/2025 8:03