How can a forensic result be a “decision”? A critical analysis of ongoing reforms of forensic reporting formats for federal examiners

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Cole_Biedermann2020.pdf (537.45 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_BD8A2A96CA81
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
How can a forensic result be a “decision”? A critical analysis of ongoing reforms of forensic reporting formats for federal examiners
Périodique
Houston Law Review
Auteur(s)
Cole Simon, Biedermann Alex
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
20/03/2020
Volume
57
Numéro
1
Pages
551–592
Langue
anglais
Résumé
The decade since the publication of the 2009 National Research Council report on forensic science has seen the increasing use of a new word to describe forensic results. What were once called “facts,” “determinations,” “conclusions,” or “opinions,” are increasingly described as “decisions.” Prior to 2009, however, the term “decision” was rarely used to describe forensic results. Lay audiences, such as lawyers, might be forgiven for perceiving this as a surprising turn. In its plain English meaning, a “decision” would seem to be a strange word choice to describe the outcome of a scientific analysis, given its connotation of choice and preference. In this Article, we trace the recent history of the term “decision” in forensic analysis. We simply and clearly explain the scientific fields of “decision theory” and “decision analysis” and their application to forensic science. We then analyze the Department of Justice (DOJ) Uniform Language for Testimony and Reporting (ULTR) documents that use the term. We argue that these documents fail to articulate coherent frameworks for reporting forensic results. The Article identifies what we perceive to be some key stumbling blocks to developing such frameworks. These include a reluctance to observe decision theory principles, a reluctance to cohere with sound probabilistic principles, and a reluctance to conform to particular logical concepts associated with these theories, such as proper scoring rules. The Article elucidates each of these perceived stumbling blocks and proposes a way to move forward to more defensible reporting frameworks. Finally, we explain what the use of the term “decision” could accomplish for forensic science and what an appropriate deployment of the term would require.
Mots-clé
Forensic science , identification, decision theory
Financement(s)
Fonds national suisse / Projets / BSSGI0_155809
Création de la notice
12/03/2020 3:09
Dernière modification de la notice
12/03/2020 7:09
Données d'usage