Interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis: a neurophysiological perspective.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_BC016E04FC78
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Interspinous distraction in lumbar spinal stenosis: a neurophysiological perspective.
Périodique
Spine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Schizas C., Pralong E., Tzioupis C., Kulik G.
ISSN
1528-1159 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0362-2436
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Numéro
24
Pages
2113-2117
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tPublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective neurophysiological study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the neurophysiological effects of interspinous distraction during spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Interspinous devices have been introduced as an alternative treatment of LSS in selected patients aiming at obtaining indirect decompression. Nevertheless, there is no data on the immediate neurophysiological effect of distraction.
METHODS: Thirty patients with LSS undergoing decompression (14 at single level, 16 at multiple levels) were enrolled, resulting in a total of 48 levels to be analyzed. Before decompression, calibrated incremental distraction simulating interspinous device implantation of 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 mm was performed. Intraoperative motor evoked potentials were acquired before any distraction, during distraction at each incremental value and after bilateral decompression. We evaluated relative changes of motor evoked potentials normalized to hand muscles and related them to the number of affected levels, LSS radiological severity based on the A to D grading, lordosis, and disc height.
RESULTS: For single-level disease, 8-mm distraction and open decompression yielded similar improvement in motor evoked potentials not only in levels with morphological grades A or B, but also in levels with morphological grades C or D (i.e., severe or extreme stenosis) (P = 0.32). In contrast, distraction superior to 8 mm was less effective (P ≤ 0.05). In multiple-level stenosis, decompression was significantly more effective than any degree of distraction (P < 0.001). No correlation of those results to disc height or lordosis was observed. Using χ trend test to analyze the effect of distraction, a linear trend favoring moderate over severe stenotic morphology was observed (P = 0.0349).
CONCLUSION: Interspinous distraction of 8 mm is sufficient to replicate electrophysiological improvements obtained during full decompression even in severe single-level stenosis but not in multilevel disease. Interspinous distraction has therefore an immediately measurable neurophysiological effect. Level of Evidence: 4.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
07/03/2014 22:58
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:30
Données d'usage