Motivational intervention to reduce cannabis use in young people with psychosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_BA224225380A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Motivational intervention to reduce cannabis use in young people with psychosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Périodique
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bonsack C., Gibellini Manetti S., Favrod J., Montagrin Y., Besson J., Bovet P., Conus P.
ISSN
1423-0348 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0033-3190
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
80
Numéro
5
Pages
287-297
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Background: Cannabis use has a negative impact on psychosis. Studies are needed to explore the efficacy of psychological interventions to reduce cannabis use in psychosis. Our aim is to study the efficacy of a specific motivational intervention on young cannabis users suffering from psychosis. Methods: Participants (aged less than 35 years) were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) alone, or treatment as usual plus motivational intervention (MI + TAU). TAU was comprehensive and included case management, early intervention and mobile team when needed. Assessments were completed at baseline and at 3, 6 and12 months follow-up. Results: Sixty-two participants (32 TAU and 30 MI + TAU) were included in the study. Cannabis use decreased in both groups at follow-up. Participants who received MI in addition to TAU displayed both a greater reduction in number of joints smoked per week and greater confidence to change cannabis use at 3 and 6 months follow-up, but differences between groups were nonsignificant at 12 months. Conclusions: MI is well accepted by patients suffering from psychosis and has a short-term impact on cannabis use when added to standard care. However, the differential effect was not maintained at 1-year follow-up. MI appears to be a useful active component to reduce cannabis use which should be integrated in routine clinical practice.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
17/06/2011 14:07
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:28
Données d'usage