Protective efficacy against malaria of a combination sporozoite and erythrocytic stage vaccine

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_B9551F5B7A0D
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Protective efficacy against malaria of a combination sporozoite and erythrocytic stage vaccine
Périodique
Immunology Letters
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Wang  R., Charoenvit  Y., Daly  T. M., Long  C. A., Corradin  G., Hoffman  S. L.
ISSN
0165-2478 (Print)
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/1996
Volume
53
Numéro
2-3
Pages
83-93
Notes
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. --- Old month value: Nov
Résumé
Most malariologists believe that optimal malaria vaccines will induce protective immune responses against different stages of the parasite's life cycle. A multiple antigen peptide (MAP) vaccine based on the Plasmodium yoelii circumsporozoite protein (PyCSP) protects mice against sporozoite challenge by inducing antibodies that prevent sporozoites from invading hepatocytes. A purified recombinant protein vaccine based on the P. yoelii merozoite surface protein-1 (PyMSP-1) protects mice against challenge with infected erythrocytes, presumably by inducing antibodies against the erythrocytic stage of the parasite. We now report studies designed to determine if the PyMSP-1 vaccine protects against challenge with sporozoites, the stage encountered in the field, and if immunization with a combination of the PyCSP and PyMSP-1 vaccines provides additive or synergistic protection against sporozoite challenge. In two experiments, using TiterMax or Ribi R-700 as adjuvant, 3 of 19 mice immunized with the PyMSP-1 vaccine were completely protected against sporozoite challenge. The remaining mice had significantly delayed onset and lower levels of peak parasitemia than did control mice (11.1 +/- 2.8% vs. 36.7 +/- 1.6% in experiment #2, P < 0.01). Immunization with the combination vaccine reduced by approximately 50% the level of antibodies induced to PyCSP and PyMSP-1, as compared to that induced by the individual components. However, in two experiments, there was evidence of additive protection. Six of 19 (31.6%) immunized with the PyCSP vaccine, 3 of 19 (15.8%) immunized with the PyMSP-1 vaccine, and 10 of 19 (52.6%) immunized with the combination were completely protected against sporozoit challenge. This modest increase in protection in the combination group may be a reflection of additive anti-PyCSP and anti-PyMSP-1 immunity, since mice in the combination group had diminished levels of antibodies to each components. These studies indicate that considerable work may be required to optimize the construction, delivery, and assessment of multi-stage malaria vaccines.
Mots-clé
Animals Antibodies, Protozoan/analysis Cell Wall Skeleton/pharmacology Cord Factors/pharmacology Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Female Immunoblotting Immunoglobulin Isotypes/analysis Lipid A/analogs & derivatives/pharmacology Malaria/*immunology/*prevention & control Merozoite Surface Protein 1 Mice Mice, Inbred BALB C Parasitemia/immunology Plasmodium yoelii/*immunology Poloxalene/pharmacology Protein Precursors/immunology Protozoan Proteins/immunology Vaccination Vaccines, Combined/*immunology Vaccines, Synthetic/*immunology
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
24/01/2008 14:55
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:27
Données d'usage