The Great Debate at "Melanoma Bridge", Naples, December 7th, 2019.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 32299446_BIB_B856D78550C3.pdf (1412.21 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_B856D78550C3
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
The Great Debate at "Melanoma Bridge", Naples, December 7th, 2019.
Périodique
Journal of translational medicine
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Ascierto P.A., Agarwala S.S., Eggermont A., Gershenwald J.E., Grob J.J., Hamid O., Michielin O., Postow M., Puzanov I., Zarour H.M., Caracò C., Testori A.
ISSN
1479-5876 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1479-5876
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
16/04/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Numéro
1
Pages
171
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
The Great Debate session at the 2019 Melanoma Bridge congress (December 5-7, Naples, Italy) featured counterpoint views from experts on five topical issues in melanoma. These were whether to choose local intratumoral treatment or systemic treatment, whether patients with stage IIIA melanoma require adjuvant therapy or not, whether treatment is better changed at disease progression or during stable disease, whether adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapy is more appropriate used before or in combination with checkpoint inhibition therapy, and whether treatment can be stopped while the patient is still on response. As was the case for previous meetings, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs. As such, positions taken by each of the melanoma experts during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal approach.
Mots-clé
Adjuvant, Anti-CTLA-4, Anti-PD-1, BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, Melanoma, Neoadjuvant, Staging immunotherapy, Targeted therapy
Pubmed
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
25/04/2020 20:05
Dernière modification de la notice
15/01/2021 8:11
Données d'usage