Qualität in der koloproktologischen Ausbildung : Wie lässt sich koloproktologische Ausbildung in den nationalen Ausbildungskatalogen qualitativ integrieren? [Quality in coloproctology training : How is coloproctology training qualitatively integrated into the national training catalogue?]

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Ninkovic2019_Article_QualitätInDerKoloproktologisch (1).pdf (339.14 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_B63ACB5A9E16
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Qualität in der koloproktologischen Ausbildung : Wie lässt sich koloproktologische Ausbildung in den nationalen Ausbildungskatalogen qualitativ integrieren? [Quality in coloproctology training : How is coloproctology training qualitatively integrated into the national training catalogue?]
Périodique
Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Ninkovic M., Fürst A., Hahnloser D., Kronberger I.E.
ISSN
1433-0385 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0009-4722
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
04/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
90
Numéro
4
Pages
257-263
Langue
allemand
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The incorporation of coloproctology as a part of the surgical training and further education of assistant and specialist physicians shows great differences between Germany, Austria and Switzerland. In this article the international and national possibilities before and after specialist medical training are described in detail. In Austria, an optional coloproctology module can already be chosen in the third year of surgical training. Coloproctology is a compulsory component during the complete surgical training in Germany but a lower number of operations are required. In the basic module in Switzerland coloproctology is compulsory but contained in the operation catalogue to a lesser extent, although it has to be explicitly chosen in the further specialist training. The mandatory training in coloproctology in Germany enables all surgical assistants to undergo training, even if it is less intensive. As a result of partially compulsory and partially optional modules in Switzerland, a lower proportion of trainees receive specific training but it is more detailed. The number of trainees who are trained in coloproctology is even smaller in Austria due to the coloproctological training being optional. In the German-speaking regions a variety of specialized courses and further education are available for assistants and surgeons to further deepen their knowledge, no matter which form of training they had. At the international level the European Board of Surgical Qualification (EBSQ) for coloproctology has been available since 1998 and for many European specialists is the only possibility for formal specialization. The quality of a coloproctology training and further education curriculum may vary with national and international factors; however, it is a parameter for high standards in coloproctology in routine daily work, for the numbers of young coloproctology surgeons and is associated with a sufficient research performance in this discipline.
Mots-clé
Austria, Colorectal Surgery/education, Curriculum, General Surgery/education, Germany, Surgeons, Switzerland, Coloproctology, European Board of Surgical Qualification, Specialist, Surgical training, Trainee
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
31/03/2019 16:45
Dernière modification de la notice
25/01/2022 8:11
Données d'usage