Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections Presenting with Septic Shock in Neutropenic Cancer Patients: Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 38674650_BIB_B1F37B325CCC.pdf (298.60 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_B1F37B325CCC
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections Presenting with Septic Shock in Neutropenic Cancer Patients: Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy.
Périodique
Microorganisms
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Royo-Cebrecos C., Laporte-Amargós J., Peña M., Ruiz-Camps I., Garcia-Vidal C., Abdala E., Oltolini C., Akova M., Montejo M., Mikulska M., Martín-Dávila P., Herrera F., Gasch O., Drgona L., Morales HMP, Brunel A.S., García E., Isler B., Kern W.V., Palacios-Baena Z.R., de la Calle G.M., Montero M.M., Kanj S.S., Sipahi O.R., Calik S., Márquez-Gómez I., Marin J.I., Gomes MZR, Hemmatii P., Araos R., Peghin M., Del Pozo J.L., Yáñez L., Tilley R., Manzur A., Novo A., Carratalà J., Gudiol C.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
IRONIC Study Group
ISSN
2076-2607 (Print)
ISSN-L
2076-2607
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
30/03/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Numéro
4
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
This large, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including onco-hematological neutropenic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PABSI) found that among 1213 episodes, 411 (33%) presented with septic shock. The presence of solid tumors (33.3% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001), a high-risk Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) index score (92.6% vs. 57.4%; p < 0.001), pneumonia (38% vs. 19.2% p < 0.001), and infection due to multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) (33.8% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001) were statistically significantly higher in patients with septic shock compared to those without. Patients with septic shock were more likely to receive inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) (21.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.020) and to present poorer outcomes, including a need for ICU admission (74% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (49.1% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001), and higher 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates (58.2% vs. 12%, p < 0.001, and 74% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Risk factors for 30-day case fatality rate in patients with septic shock were orotracheal intubation, IEAT, infection due to MDRPA, and persistent PABSI. Therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and BSI from the urinary tract were associated with improved survival. Carbapenems were the most frequent IEAT in patients with septic shock, and the use of empirical combination therapy showed a tendency towards improved survival. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored management strategies in this high-risk population.
Mots-clé
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, bacteremia, bloodstream infection, cancer, neutropenia, septic shock
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
03/05/2024 15:05
Dernière modification de la notice
09/08/2024 15:04
Données d'usage