An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_B023C2646FA4
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke.
Périodique
Neurology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Kent D.M., Ruthazer R., Weimar C., Mas J.L., Serena J., Homma S., Di Angelantonio E., Di Tullio M.R., Lutz J.S., Elkind M.S., Griffith J., Jaigobin C., Mattle H.P., Michel P., Mono M.L., Nedeltchev K., Papetti F., Thaler D.E.
ISSN
1526-632X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0028-3878
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2013
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
81
Numéro
7
Pages
619-625
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to create an index to stratify cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) by their likelihood that the stroke was related to their PFO.
METHODS: Using data from 12 component studies, we used generalized linear mixed models to predict the presence of PFO among patients with CS, and derive a simple index to stratify patients with CS. We estimated the stratum-specific PFO-attributable fraction and stratum-specific stroke/TIA recurrence rates.
RESULTS: Variables associated with a PFO in CS patients included younger age, the presence of a cortical stroke on neuroimaging, and the absence of these factors: diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and prior stroke or TIA. The 10-point Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score is calculated from these variables so that the youngest patients with superficial strokes and without vascular risk factors have the highest score. PFO prevalence increased from 23% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19%-26%) in those with 0 to 3 points to 73% (95% CI: 66%-79%) in those with 9 or 10 points, corresponding to attributable fraction estimates of approximately 0% to 90%. Kaplan-Meier estimated stroke/TIA 2-year recurrence rates decreased from 20% (95% CI: 12%-28%) in the lowest Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score stratum to 2% (95% CI: 0%-4%) in the highest.
CONCLUSION: Clinical characteristics identify CS patients who vary markedly in PFO prevalence, reflecting clinically important variation in the probability that a discovered PFO is likely to be stroke-related vs incidental. Patients in strata more likely to have stroke-related PFOs have lower recurrence risk.
Mots-clé
Aged, Female, Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications, Foramen Ovale, Patent/epidemiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Stroke/classification, Stroke/etiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
07/03/2014 19:06
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:19
Données d'usage