Comparison of HTK-Custodiol and St-Thomas solution as cardiac preservation solutions on early and midterm outcomes following heart transplantation.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 38806181.pdf (1753.74 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_AE9A6D7A3D58
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Comparison of HTK-Custodiol and St-Thomas solution as cardiac preservation solutions on early and midterm outcomes following heart transplantation.
Périodique
Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Dulguerov F., Abdurashidowa T., Christophel-Plathier E., Ion L., Gunga Z., Rancati V., Yerly P., Tozzi P., Albert A., Ltaief Z., Rotman S., Meyer P., Lefol K., Hullin R., Kirsch M.
ISSN
2753-670X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2753-670X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/06/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
38
Numéro
6
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The choice of the cardiac preservation solution for myocardial protection at time of heart procurement remains controversial and uncertainties persist regarding its effect on the early and midterm heart transplantation (HTx) outcomes. We retrospectively compared our adult HTx performed with 2 different solutions, in terms of hospital mortality, mid-term survival, inotropic score, primary graft dysfunction and rejection score.
From January 2009 to December 2020, 154 consecutive HTx of adult patients, followed up in pre- and post-transplantation by 2 different tertiary centres, were performed at the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. From 2009 to 2015, the cardiac preservation solution used was exclusively St-Thomas, whereafter an institutional decision was made to use HTK-Custodiol only. Patients were classified in 2 groups accordingly.
There were 75 patients in the St-Thomas group and 79 patients in the HTK-Custodiol group. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. Postoperatively, compared to the St-Thomas group, the Custodiol group patients showed significantly lower inotropic scores [median (interquartile range): 35.7 (17.5-60.2) vs 71.8 (31.8-127), P < 0.001], rejection scores [0.08 (0.0-0.25) vs 0.14 (0.05-0.5), P = 0.036] and 30-day mortality rate (2.5% vs 14.7%, P = 0.007) even after adjusting for potential confounders. Microscopic analysis of the endomyocardial biopsies also showed less specific histological features of subendothelial ischaemia (3.8% vs 17.3%, P = 0.006). There was no difference in primary graft dysfunction requiring postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The use of HTK-Custodiol solution significantly improved midterm survival (Custodiol versus St-Thomas: hazard ratio = 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.069-0.60, P = 0.004).
This retrospective study comparing St-Thomas solution and HTK-Custodiol as myocardial protection during heart procurement showed that Custodiol improves outcomes after HTx, including postoperative inotropic score, rejection score, 30-day mortality and midterm survival.
Mots-clé
Acute cellular rejection, All-cause mortality, Cardiac preservation solution, Heart transplantation, Inotropic score
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
13/06/2024 15:57
Dernière modification de la notice
14/06/2024 7:15
Données d'usage