Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_AC79D4807A5E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.
Périodique
Clinical Nutrition
Auteur(s)
Lassen K., Coolsen M.M., Slim K., Carli F., de Aguilar-Nascimento J.E., Schäfer M., Parks R.W., Fearon K.C., Lobo D.N., Demartines N., Braga M., Ljungqvist O., Dejong C.H., Metabolism , Nutrition 
Collaborateur(s)
ERAS® Society, European Society for Clinical Nutrition, International Association for Surgical Metabolism
Contributeur(s)
Metabolism , Nutrition 
ISSN
1532-1983 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0261-5614
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
31
Numéro
6
Pages
817-830
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Protocols for enhanced recovery provide comprehensive and evidence-based guidelines for best perioperative care. Protocol implementation may reduce complication rates and enhance functional recovery and, as a result of this, also reduce length-of-stay in hospital. There is no comprehensive framework available for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: An international working group constructed within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society constructed a comprehensive and evidence-based framework for best perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Data were retrieved from standard databases and personal archives. Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the GRADE system and reached through consensus in the group. The quality of evidence was rated "high", "moderate", "low" or "very low". Recommendations were graded as "strong" or "weak".
RESULTS: Comprehensive guidelines are presented. Available evidence is summarised and recommendations given for 27 care items. The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence-based guidelines provide the necessary platform upon which to base a unified protocol for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy. A unified protocol allows for comparison between centres and across national borders. It facilitates multi-institutional prospective cohort registries and adequately powered randomised trials.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
06/02/2013 10:58
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:16
Données d'usage