Monitoring Disease Activity and Progression in Crohn's Disease. A Swiss Perspective on the IBD Ahead 'Optimised Monitoring' Recommendations.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_AC3D7E3E137E
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Monitoring Disease Activity and Progression in Crohn's Disease. A Swiss Perspective on the IBD Ahead 'Optimised Monitoring' Recommendations.
Périodique
Digestion
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Sauter B., Beglinger C., Girardin M., Macpherson A., Michetti P., Schoepfer A., Seibold F., Vavricka S.R., Rogler G.
ISSN
1421-9867 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0012-2823
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
89
Numéro
4
Pages
299-309
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish Document Type: Review PDF: Review
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The structured IBD Ahead 'Optimised Monitoring' programme was designed to obtain the opinion, insight and advice of gastroenterologists on optimising the monitoring of Crohn's disease activity in four settings: (1) assessment at diagnosis, (2) monitoring in symptomatic patients, (3) monitoring in asymptomatic patients, and (4) the postoperative follow-up. For each of these settings, four monitoring methods were discussed: (a) symptom assessment, (b) endoscopy, (c) laboratory markers, and (d) imaging. Based on literature search and expert opinion compiled during an international consensus meeting, recommendations were given to answer the question 'which diagnostic method, when, and how often'. The International IBD Ahead Expert Panel advised to tailor this guidance to the healthcare system and the special prerequisites of each country. The IBD Ahead Swiss National Steering Committee proposes best-practice recommendations adapted for Switzerland.
METHODS: The IBD Ahead Steering Committee identified key questions and provided the Swiss Expert Panel with a structured literature research. The expert panel agreed on a set of statements. During an international expert meeting the consolidated outcome of the national meetings was merged into final statements agreed by the participating International and National Steering Committee members - the IBD Ahead 'Optimized Monitoring' Consensus.
RESULTS: A systematic assessment of symptoms, endoscopy findings, and laboratory markers with special emphasis on faecal calprotectin is deemed necessary even in symptom-free patients. The choice of recommended imaging methods is adapted to the specific situation in Switzerland and highlights the importance of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging besides endoscopy.
CONCLUSION: The recommendations stress the importance of monitoring disease activity on a regular basis and by objective parameters, such as faecal calprotectin and endoscopy with detailed documentation of findings. Physicians should not rely on symptoms only and adapt the monitoring schedule and choice of options to individual situations. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
05/09/2014 18:21
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:16
Données d'usage