The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_AAC5979E0C24
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice.
Périodique
Current osteoporosis reports
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Hans D., Šteňová E., Lamy O.
ISSN
1544-2241 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1544-1873
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
15
Numéro
6
Pages
521-531
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
There is an increasing body of evidence that the trabecular bone score (TBS), a surrogate of bone microarchitecture extracted from spine DXA, could play an important role in the management of patients with osteoporosis or at risk of fracture. The current paper reviews this published body of scientific literature on TBS and answers the most relevant clinical questions.
TBS has repeatedly been proven to be predictive of fragility fractures, current and future, and this is largely independent of BMD, CRF, and the FRAX, and when used in conjunction with any one of these measures, it consistently enhances their accuracy. There also is a growing body of evidence indicating that the TBS has particular advantages over BMD for specific causes of increased fracture risk, like chronic corticosteroid excess, type-2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, and patients being treated with anti-aromatase and primary hyperparathyroidism, conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. TBS enhances performance of the FRAX tool, where its greatest utility appears to lie in its ability to accurately classify those patients whose BMD level lies close to the intervention threshold, aiding in decisions on whether treatment is warranted or not. Furthermore, TBS has also particular advantages over BMD in secondary osteoporosis. While the role of TBS with monitoring could be important as the different molecules impact logically TBS to various degrees, large clinical trials are still needed.
Mots-clé
Absorptiometry, Photon, Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects, Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use, Bone Density, Cancellous Bone/diagnostic imaging, Comorbidity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology, Humans, Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/epidemiology, Osteoporosis/chemically induced, Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging, Osteoporotic Fractures/complications, Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology, Risk Assessment, Spine/diagnostic imaging, Bone mineral density, Clinical risk factors, FRAX, Fracture risk, Osteoporosis, Review, Trabecular bone score
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
19/10/2017 15:10
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:14
Données d'usage