Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Bernhard & Kübler 2023.pdf (222.44 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_A9FA84058A1D
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
Périodique
Media and Communication
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Bernhard Laurent, Kübler Daniel
ISSN
2183-2439
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
31/01/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Numéro
1
Pages
31-42
Langue
anglais
Résumé
Despite the growing importance of new technologies, research on individual opinion formation in the digital domain is still in its infancy. This article empirically examines citizens’ use of social media in the context of direct democracy. Based on previous work, we expect men to form their opinions on social media more frequently than women (gender gap hypothesis). In the second step, we focus on the contextual level by examining the role campaigns play in reducing this discrepancy. More specifically, we hypothesize that the presumed gender gap narrows in accordance with the increasing intensity of public debates that precede ballots (interaction hypothesis). The empirical analysis draws on 13 post-ballot surveys held at Switzerland’s federal level from 2016 to 2020 and supports both the gender gap and the interaction hypotheses.
Mots-clé
Campaign, Digitization, Direct democracy, Gender gap, Media coverage, Political communication, Public debate, Social media, Switzerland
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
01/02/2023 17:13
Dernière modification de la notice
02/02/2023 7:13
Données d'usage