AIRO GORTEC consensus on postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk early stages oral squamous cell cancers (OSCC).

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_A8EE44EDCADD
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
AIRO GORTEC consensus on postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk early stages oral squamous cell cancers (OSCC).
Périodique
Radiotherapy and oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Merlotti A., Alterio D., Orlandi E., Racadot S., Bonomo P., Franco P., D'Angelo E., Ursino S., Pointreau Y., Lapeyre M., Graff P., Di Rito A., Argenone A., Musio D., De Felice F., Dionisi F., Fanetti G., D'Onofrio I., Belgioia L., Maddalo M., Scricciolo M., Bourhis J., Russi E., Thariat J.
ISSN
1879-0887 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0167-8140
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
12/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
177
Pages
95-104
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Evidence on the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) remains inconclusive. Members of a task force from two national radio-oncology Associations (AIRO and GORTEC) defined 14 clinically relevant questions to identify "gray areas" pertinent to the indication for PORT in this clinical setting. Consequently, a literature review was performed on the topic. The resulting statements were then rated by an Expert Panel (EP) using a modified Delphi method. Only radiation oncologists were part of the discussion and voting on the scenarios. There was agreement on the 14 statements at the first round of voting. The task force then decided to propose clinical cases for the two more controversial statements that had received a lower agreement to better capture the Experts' attitudes. The clinical cases highlighted a more significant decisional heterogeneity. However, the good level of consensus reached among the two Associations gives relevant support in informing clinical choices while acknowledging general indications cannot fit all clinical situations and do not replace multidisciplinary discussion.
Mots-clé
Humans, Consensus, Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy, Mouth Neoplasms/surgery, Mouth Neoplasms/pathology, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Delphi Technique, Early stage oral cavity cancer, Head and neck cancer, Postoperative radiotherapy
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
23/11/2022 9:50
Dernière modification de la notice
25/02/2023 7:46
Données d'usage