Right ventricular systolic function and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_A6F8473AA66D
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Right ventricular systolic function and cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Périodique
Europace
ISSN
1532-2092 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1099-5129
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2010
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
12
Numéro
3
Pages
389-394
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) has not been well studied. Furthermore, it is unclear whether baseline RVEF influences response to CRT. To evaluate the acute and chronic effects of CRT on right ventricular systolic function, and to investigate whether baseline RVEF impacts response to CRT.
Forty-four patients with a standard indication for CRT underwent radionuclide angiography at baseline and after at least 6 months' follow-up for measuring RVEF, right ventricular synchrony (using phase analysis), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In addition, NYHA functional class and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were evaluated. There were no significant acute changes in RVEF with CRT. After a mean follow-up of 9 +/- 5 months, RVEF was slightly improved (by 1.9 +/- 5.0% in absolute terms, P = 0.016), and to a lesser extent than LVEF (5.1 +/- 9.0%, P = 0.009 compared with RVEF). Right ventricular dyssynchrony was significantly improved at follow-up (P = 0.016). Patients with a baseline RVEF < or = 0.35 (n = 19) were less likely to improve in NYHA class (P = 0.016), and also tended to improve less in 6MWD and LVEF (P < 0.06).
Cardiac resynchronization therapy has no acute effect on RVEF, and only slightly improves RVEF at follow-up. Patients with reduced RVEF at baseline were less likely to respond to CRT, indicating that right ventricular systolic dysfunction may play a role in patient selection.
Forty-four patients with a standard indication for CRT underwent radionuclide angiography at baseline and after at least 6 months' follow-up for measuring RVEF, right ventricular synchrony (using phase analysis), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In addition, NYHA functional class and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were evaluated. There were no significant acute changes in RVEF with CRT. After a mean follow-up of 9 +/- 5 months, RVEF was slightly improved (by 1.9 +/- 5.0% in absolute terms, P = 0.016), and to a lesser extent than LVEF (5.1 +/- 9.0%, P = 0.009 compared with RVEF). Right ventricular dyssynchrony was significantly improved at follow-up (P = 0.016). Patients with a baseline RVEF < or = 0.35 (n = 19) were less likely to improve in NYHA class (P = 0.016), and also tended to improve less in 6MWD and LVEF (P < 0.06).
Cardiac resynchronization therapy has no acute effect on RVEF, and only slightly improves RVEF at follow-up. Patients with reduced RVEF at baseline were less likely to respond to CRT, indicating that right ventricular systolic dysfunction may play a role in patient selection.
Mots-clé
Aged, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging, Heart Failure/physiopathology, Heart Failure/therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Stroke Volume/physiology, Systole/physiology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnostic imaging, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/physiopathology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/therapy, Ventricular Function, Left/physiology, Ventricular Function, Right/physiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
03/03/2024 18:08
Dernière modification de la notice
11/03/2024 7:17