Improvement of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prolonged cardiac surgery by automated alerts in the operating room.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: REF.pdf (998.83 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
ID Serval
serval:BIB_A68EAE64D981
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Etude de cas (case report): rapporte une observation et la commente brièvement.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Improvement of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prolonged cardiac surgery by automated alerts in the operating room.
Périodique
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Zanetti G., Flanagan H.L., Cohn L.H., Giardina R., Platt R.
ISSN
0899-823X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/2003
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
24
Numéro
1
Pages
13-16
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an automated intraoperative alert to redose prophylactic antibiotics in prolonged cardiac operations. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded trial. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery that lasted more than 4 hours after the preoperative administration of cefazolin, unless they were receiving therapeutic antibiotics at the time of surgery. INTERVENTION: Randomization to an audible and visual reminder on the operating room computer console at 225 minutes after the administration of preoperative antibiotics (reminder group, n = 137) or control (n = 136). After another 30 minutes, the circulating nurse was required to indicate whether a follow-up dose of antibiotics had been administered. RESULTS: Intraoperative redosing was significantly more frequent in the reminder group (93 of 137; 68%) than in the control group (55 of 136; 40%) (adjusted odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.97 to 5.56; P < .0001). The impact of the reminder was even greater when compared with the 6 months preceding the study period (129 of 480; 27%; P < .001), suggesting some spillover effect on the control group. Redosing was formally declined for 19 of the 44 patients in the reminder group without redosing. The rate of surgical-site infection in the reminder group (5 of 137; 4%) was similar to that in the control group (8 of 136; 6%; P = .42), but significantly lower than that in the pre-study period (48 of 480; 10%; P = .02). CONCLUSION: The use of an automatic reminder system in the operating room improved compliance with guidelines on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
Mots-clé
Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Automation, Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects, Drug Administration Schedule, Guideline Adherence, Humans, Intraoperative Care, Odds Ratio, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reminder Systems, Single-Blind Method, Surgical Wound Infection/prevention &amp, control
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
21/01/2008 11:04
Dernière modification de la notice
14/02/2022 8:56
Données d'usage