Assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in head-injured patients: a validation study.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_A65DAA562520
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in head-injured patients: a validation study.
Périodique
Stroke
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Steiner L.A., Coles J.P., Johnston A.J., Chatfield D.A., Smielewski P., Fryer T.D., Aigbirhio F.I., Clark J.C., Pickard J.D., Menon D.K., Czosnyka M.
ISSN
1524-4628[electronic]
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2003
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
34
Numéro
10
Pages
2404-2409
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Validation Studies
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebrovascular autoregulation is frequently measured in head-injured patients. We attempted to validate 4 bedside methods used for assessment of autoregulation. METHODS: PET was performed at a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) of 70 and 90 mm Hg in 20 patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRo2) were determined at each CPP level. Patients were sedated with propofol and fentanyl. Norepinephrine was used to control CPP. During PET scanning, transcranial Doppler (TCD) flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was monitored, and the arterio-jugular oxygen content difference (AJDo2) was measured at each CPP. Autoregulation was determined as the static rate of autoregulation based on PET (SROR(PET)) and TCD (SROR(TCD)) data, based on changes in AJDo2, and with 2 indexes based on the relationship between slow waves of CPP and flow velocity (mean velocity index, Mx) and between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure (pressure reactivity index, PRx) RESULTS: We found significant correlations between SROR(PET) and SROR(TCD) (r2=0.32; P<0.01) and between SROR(PET) and PRx (r2=0.31; P<0.05). There were no significant associations between PET data and autoregulation as assessed by changes in AJDo2. Global CMRo2 was significantly lower at the higher CPP (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite some variability, SROR(TCD) and PRx may provide useful approximations of autoregulation in head-injured patients. At least with our methods, CMRo2 changes with the increase in CPP; hence, flow-metabolism coupling may affect the results of autoregulation testing.
Mots-clé
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Flow Velocity, Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology, Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnosis, Craniocerebral Trauma/physiopathology, Glasgow Coma Scale, Homeostasis, Humans, Middle Aged, Middle Cerebral Artery/physiopathology, Middle Cerebral Artery/ultrasonography, Oxygen Consumption, Point-of-Care Systems/standards, Predictive Value of Tests, Tomography, Emission-Computed
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
29/12/2009 18:06
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:11
Données d'usage