Cognitive errors assessed by observer ratings in bipolar affective disorder: relationship with symptoms and therapeutic alliance

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 10.1017-S1754470X09990043.pdf (127.01 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_9DF82C9E3488
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Cognitive errors assessed by observer ratings in bipolar affective disorder: relationship with symptoms and therapeutic alliance
Périodique
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Kramer Ueli, Bodenmann Guy, Drapeau Martin
ISSN
1754-470X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2009
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
2
Numéro
2
Pages
92-105
Langue
anglais
Résumé
The construct of cognitive errors is clinically relevant for cognitive therapy of mood disorders. Beck's universality hypothesis postulates the relevance of negative cognitions in all subtypes of mood disorders, as well as positive cognitions for manic states. This hypothesis has rarely been empirically addressed for patients presenting bipolar affective disorder (BD). In-patients (n = 30) presenting with BD were interviewed, as were 30 participants of a matched control group. Valid and reliable observer-rater methodology for cognitive errors was applied to the session transcripts. Overall, patients make more cognitive errors than controls. When manic and depressive patients were compared, parts of the universality hypothesis were confirmed. Manic symptoms are related to positive and negative cognitive errors. These results are discussed with regard to the main assumptions of the cognitive model for depression; thus adding an argument for extending it to the BD diagnostic group, taking into consideration specificities in terms of cognitive errors. Clinical implications for cognitive therapy of BD are suggested.
Création de la notice
29/09/2009 9:47
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:04
Données d'usage