Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: bjs6321.pdf (160.38 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_9895C1ED60B0
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Périodique
British Journal of Surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Hubner M., Demartines N., Muller S., Dindo D., Clavien P.A., Hahnloser D.
ISSN
1365-2168 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0007-1323
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
95
Numéro
9
Pages
1098-1104
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled TrialPublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Many instruments are used for laparoscopic dissection, including monopolar electrosurgery scissors (MES), electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers (BVS) and ultrasonically coagulating shears (UCS). These three devices were compared with regard to dissection time, blood loss, safety and costs.
METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left-sided colectomy were randomized to MES, BVS or UCS. The primary endpoint was dissection time.
RESULTS: Patient and operation characteristics did not differ between the groups. Median dissection time was significantly shorter with BVS (105 min) and UCS (90 min) than with MES (137 min) (P < 0.001). With BVS and UCS, significantly fewer additional clips were required (MES 9 versus BVS 0 versus UCS 3; P < 0.001) and there was a trend towards lower blood loss (125 versus 50 versus 50 ml respectively; P = 0.223) and a reduced volume of suction fluid (425 versus 80 versus 110 ml; P = 0.058). Overall satisfaction was similar for the three instruments. Dissection with BVS and UCS was significantly cheaper than with MES, assuming a centre volume of 200 cases per year (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: BVS and UCS shorten dissection time in laparoscopic left-sided colectomy and are cost-effective compared with MES.
Mots-clé
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Colectomy/economics, Colectomy/instrumentation, Costs and Cost Analysis, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy/economics, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surgical Instruments
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
07/10/2014 14:23
Dernière modification de la notice
27/01/2022 15:12
Données d'usage