Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_8BCD94AA6177
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.
Périodique
The Lancet. Oncology
Auteur(s)
Rietjens JAC, Sudore R.L., Connolly M., van Delden J.J., Drickamer M.A., Droger M., van der Heide A., Heyland D.K., Houttekier D., Janssen DJA, Orsi L., Payne S., Seymour J., Jox R.J., Korfage I.J.
Collaborateur(s)
European Association for Palliative Care
ISSN
1474-5488 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1470-2045
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
09/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Numéro
9
Pages
e543-e551
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly implemented in oncology and beyond, but a definition of ACP and recommendations concerning its use are lacking. We used a formal Delphi consensus process to help develop a definition of ACP and provide recommendations for its application. Of the 109 experts (82 from Europe, 16 from North America, and 11 from Australia) who rated the ACP definitions and its 41 recommendations, agreement for each definition or recommendation was between 68-100%. ACP was defined as the ability to enable individuals to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with family and health-care providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate. Recommendations included the adaptation of ACP based on the readiness of the individual; targeting ACP content as the individual's health condition worsens; and, using trained non-physician facilitators to support the ACP process. We present a list of outcome measures to enable the pooling and comparison of results of ACP studies. We believe that our recommendations can provide guidance for clinical practice, ACP policy, and research.

Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
25/09/2017 17:53
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 15:50
Données d'usage